About Ibn Taymiyyah

asalamu alaikum

I coped some of the material from here like from Abul-Khataab or Abu Turaab in the transliteration of his praises from the aimah, I constructed this page in the form of arguements andi s, inshallah, quite useful for ahlu-sunnah

http://al-mustaqeem.tripod.com/id18.html

asalamu alaikum

JazakAllah for that!

assalam,
Dear bro,
I would like to know if all the presons who quote ibn taymiyyah as genuine,where in anyway the followers of his teachings or spreading his teachings.

please answer it's very important for me

Please eloborate your question. It is unclear.

it has no significance in reality. I will explain it quite explicitly and then explain it in detail
explicitly, those who spoke of him in his reverence were all and everyone, some of his opposers, one of which is quoted in this reference I gave who is the shaykh who actually took the slanders to the shariah court, also they include his students, and also they include other ulema who merely revere him and make valid the authenticness of his aqeedah., and many others who never met him and were never his students.

So this is the clear explaination, but to explain the insignicance of this is as well quite simple.

We, ahlu-sunnah, do not need to look at the reality of the praisers of an-Nawawee. We do not need to look at those who praised him were his students and "those who were affected" by him. Scholars give prasie or criticism period. They dont give praise or condemnation, jarh wa t'adeel, based on affiliation or abandonement of someone, rather they review the reality of the person in question and then decide whether t'adeel or jarh is sutiable for such a person. So when we have Ibn Hajr explaining Ibn taymiyyah's reality, we dont say "oh he is just saying that bcause he was affected by his doctrine' infact no one who inclines to ashari ideas would accept this. In fact they do not like the fact hat Ibn hajr had said what he said about Ibn taymiyyah because to them, Ibn Hajr is almost one of them which is an outright lie.

Ibn hajr accepted him not because "he was inffected by his ideas" but because he reviewed his aqeedah to be saleem and thus warented what he said of him. The same goes for Imaam adh-Dhahabee. Although he is his student, his praise of Ibn taymiyyah is not tied to the fact that he was a student of his and had reverence for him. That is because these people, these hufaadh are above this. Had he witnessed any deviations that warrented abandonement and revilement, adh-Dhahabee would have been foremost in warning against Ibn taymiyyah, but it is through his adala that caused him to review his aqeedah to see if it is in line with haq, and upon finding no deviancies, then as such he praised his shaykh.

jarh wa t'adeel is looked at from the angle of who knows the reality of such and such from their creedal aspects, it is not based on attachment or abandonment of the people on an individual in question.

and lastly, the reason why such a question if analyzed is totally unclear is the fact that you say "followers of his teachings or spreaders of his teachings'.

if the teeachings of one is the quraan and sunnah, then those who call to the quran and sunnah cannot be called or labeled "one who spreads such and such teachings' because the actual foundation of their teachings is quran and sunah as authentically understood. I dont see Ibn hajr, or Shawkani or countless other ulema to have spread his teachings because they were all united upon a particular matter, the book and sunnah. So when I hear Imaams to have praised barbaharee, we do not call those who prasie him as "spreading his teachings" likewise, we dont call the one who praised and spoke overly praise for Ahmad Bin hanbal or others to be "spreading their teachings". We dont call Abu Dawood "spreading the teeachings of Ahmad" or Bukharee of "spreading" the teachings of Ahmad, or Ibn Adbul-bar spreading he teachings of Imaam maalik, because they were all one of the same cloth.

I hope this puts some light to you akhee
asalamu alaikum

this might also help you out inshaAllah in your article....Abu Rumaysah does a really good job, Masha'Allah

Praise of the Scholas of Ibn Taymiyya

yes i used references in that as well

asalamu alaikum

AsSalam Alaikum.

Here is the collection of his articles and books online:

http://abdurrahman.org/scholars/IbnTaimiyyah.html

asalamu alaikum ikhwaan
here is a PDF DOWNLAOD OF IT WITH BETTER LOOKS AND TWEAKS HAHA

Exposition of the Affairs Related to Ibn Taymiyyah

asalamu alaikum