The FFO Consortium -> Vigo and Zkiller

Vigo and Zkiller

Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic

Exophus	Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:23 PM
Arion Inair Dorundur Group: Development Posts: 3,244 Member No.: 598 Joined: 14-November 06	Riddle me this. Do you have any solid, 100% undisputed proof against Z? Hell, do you even have 50%? No. All you guys have is hearsay. This post has been edited by Exophus on Jun 3 2009, 04:24 PM --------------------

Locke

Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:26 PM

FFO's Janitor

Group: Admin
Posts: 2,065
Member No.: 248
Joined: 8-June 05

QUOTE

Do you have any solid, 100% undisputed proof against Z?

Is your definition of 100% proof a video or an outright confession or one of us physically being there? Do you believe those are the only situations in which we should ever enforce the rules?

--------------------

Nabutso

Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:28 PM

Destroyer of Terulia

Group: Development
Posts: 1,802
Member No.: 1,277
Joined: 10-July 08

Yes I Belive Zkiller's Word Over Anyone Elses Too, Baldophus.

--------------------

QUOTE (Tristan @ Apr 16 2009, 08:32 PM)

haha@your hp never going past the "D" in Gold

nerf nerf nerf nerf

Exophus	Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:29 PM
Arion Inair Dorundur Group: Development Posts: 3,244 Member No.: 598 Joined: 14-November 06	Ok well what are you basing your judgement on? The only thing you guys even presented against Zkiller is a screenshot of vigo saying "it was probably z" which in the end is the same thing as "i don't know who it was". You have no evidence. If you have something that's actually concrete then show everyone. His past record doesn't count and the fact that he has Vigo's key information doesn't count. A ton of people have Vigo's key info. Hell, I have Vigo's key info. Nabutso, I never once said I believed Zkiller. Don't put words into my mouth. I even said I don't even know if he did it or not. I said the fact that they have a severe lack of evidence means that he should not be banned. This post has been edited by Exophus on Jun 3 2009, 04:30 PM --------------------

Tristan	Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:31 PM
1234ideclareathumbwar Group: Members II Posts: 2,420 Member No.: 221 Joined: 17-May 05	You banned Zkiller on speculation. 100% proof isn't necessary, but you guys don't have anything. Vigo admitting that he didn't log on his character in that instance is one thing, but to ban Zkiller like that is really silly, whether he has had a record in the past or not. --------------------

Nabutso

Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:43 PM

Destroyer of Terulia

Group: Development
Posts: 1,802
Member No.: 1,277
Joined: 10-July 08

This is also a tyranical society, not america.
owned.

Listen to Garral, your overlord.....

--------------------

QUOTE (Tristan @ Apr 16 2009, 08:32 PM)

haha@your hp never going past the "D" in Gold

nerf nerf nerf nerf

Locke	Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:46 PM
FFO's Janitor Group: Admin Posts: 2,065 Member No.: 248 Joined: 8-June 05	I like how you guys can't even answer my question. All it requires is a simple 'yes' or 'no'. --------------------

Tristan

Posted: Jun 3 2009, 04:50 PM

1234ideclareathumbwar

Group: Members II
Posts: 2,420
Member No.: 221
Joined: 17-May 05

QUOTE (Locke @ Jun 3 2009, 04:46 PM)

I like how you guys can't even answer my question. All it requires is a simple 'yes' or 'no'.

I answered your question. I said 100% proof isn't necessary. There comes a point where proof is proof because it's just.. obvious. This isn't. There's nothing putting Zkiller at the "crime scene" or anything.

Of course, you seem to be dodging that part of the argument very swiftly.

This post has been edited by Tristan on Jun 3 2009, 04:51 PM

--------------------