Skin created by Kman. Find more great skins at the IF Skin Zone.




  Replying to Rain
Unregistered User Info
Enter your Name
Code Buttons
 Guided Mode
 Normal Mode
  Close all Tags

Open Tags:   
Enter your Post
Clickable Smilies
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
     
Show All

Post Options  Enable emoticons?
 Enable signature?
Original Post to Quote
You may edit the post you are quoting here
Post Icons
Cancel Post
Send Post
                                
                                
  [ Use None ]
User Verification To keep away spam, please complete the following:
 



Last 10 Posts [ In reverse order ]
Nix Posted on Jul 28 2012, 09:08 AM
  Okay, I am replying to a two-month-old topic, the OP of which hasn't been active her in a month and a half and will probably never read this. I know this is therefore probably a bad idea, but I am going to do it anyway.

QUOTE (Voidswimmer @ May 12 2012, 05:44 AM)
And most people would then need to do some research to figure out which god unless they clearly remembered them.

Er... no offense intended, but actually, you don't seem to have remembered the Aztec gods yourself as clearly as you thought you did. Quetzalcoatl wasn't a rain god. Quetzalcoatl was a god of wind, and of knowledge, among other things; he had nothing to do with rain at all. The Aztec rain god was Tlaloc.

Not that it particularly matters to your story, since the god was never mentioned by name, but... eh, just thought I'd bring it up.
pare321 Posted on May 13 2012, 08:48 PM
  I understood that it was a sacrifice to an aztec god, but I didn't get that it was specifically Quetzlcoatl. I guess I just kinda forgot that part of history class. Also, for some reason, I just assumed he had killed his daughter, as opposed to a random villager. I guess maybe because she'd be more valuable? Dunno.
Even though it seems like I didn't exactly get all the details, I understood the story and I really liked it. It's short but effective.
Voidswimmer Posted on May 12 2012, 05:44 AM
  I admit it is a tad obscure.

Specificly, the farmer turned to pagan rituals and when killing a calf almost worked he decided to make a sacrifice to the rain god Quetzlcoatl, and finally killed his wife in a ritual because she found out he was killing villagers.

So far only one person was able to piece that all together just reading it, but that suggests the information is included. The specific god he killed people for is the hard part. The clear referance to the aztec and inca sacrifices with the stepped pyramids and daggers (included as a clue) would trigger instantly but only if the person ever had a history lesson about them, or lived in SA or a bordering area. And most people would then need to do some research to figure out which god unless they clearly remembered them. That is a bit of a barrier to casual enjoyment.
scythemantis Posted on May 11 2012, 04:11 AM
  No really Dodoman criticizes things and dislikes things for no apparent reason other than bitterness because he became a teenedager.
leesamfish Posted on May 11 2012, 02:45 AM
  I liked it, I just feel like the delivery lacked something... Like, maybe instead of a day-by-day thing, go for a "here's why I did what I did" thing at the very end, explaining about why he did it. It's kind of cliched, with the whole "let me tell you how this madness started", but I think it would work better in this case.
Chupacabra Posted on May 9 2012, 04:31 AM
  Indeed. I also found the segments detailing the narrator's fervent religious rituals, even before his conversion, highly appropriate. It does a good job of showing that the behavior wasn't a drastic leap into insanity.
Voidswimmer Posted on May 9 2012, 04:19 AM
 
QUOTE (Chupacabra @ May 9 2012, 03:24 AM)
Voidswimmer, please ignore Dodoman. He's a wretched contrarian.

I do appreciate that you depicted insanity as something other than off the wall looniness.

I value his opinion I just didnt like how the work looked when it traced a longer period of time (in the bi-weekly notes style) so i compacted it. Changing the dates to represent a longer timespan however does lend some verisimilitude.


Your...human jaw sig...it's hard to not just watch it.
So...look away...

The concept that murder isnt something you can dabble in is very old. MacBeth explores it in depth even. If you kill someone in liturature, eventually you need to kill again to resolve the problem, or kill again to silence a witness.

Realisticly a human in desperation is more and more willing as time goes on to accept extreme measures as neccisary. Once the first step is taken the Sunk-Cost-Fallacy can keep them locked into a course of action.
If one can accept the farmers diary as factual and the sacrifices to Quetzalcoatl really are bringing the rain we can see how he might fall into the trap of deciding he needs to keep killing.
dodoman1 Posted on May 9 2012, 03:48 AM
  I guess it's just not for me.
Chupacabra Posted on May 9 2012, 03:24 AM
  Voidswimmer, please ignore Dodoman. He's a wretched contrarian.

I do appreciate that you depicted insanity as something other than off the wall looniness.
Voidswimmer Posted on May 9 2012, 03:12 AM
  Constructive Critisicm =/= being an asshole
You should probably remember that. I know a lot of modern people only understand critisicm in terms of ass-hatery because of Simon and internet people like Yahtzee but really, it doesnt.


But regardless, there is no reason I cannot expand the time period, so I have done so. It doesnt detract from the work in my eyes and if it improves it in yours then so much the better.

Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.0809 seconds | Archive