></a>
</div>
<!-- google_ad_section_start(weight=0) -->
<!-- IE6/Win TABLE FIX -->
<table  width=  · Portal  Help      Search      Members      Calendar

Create your own social network with a free forum.
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to The 110 Club. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you will be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Once you have registered, please post in "Welcome Center" to request administrator validation.

Join our community!

If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features.

Name:   Password:


Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 Addendum for Martha Graham's case
toanglobal
Posted: May 21 2012, 10:21 PM


Top Ten


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 292
Member No.: 1,202
Joined: 29-October 11



I think in the list of 100 undisputedly oldest women only need to have three addendum cases rather than 4, Martha Graham is proven to live at least 114 years 180 days circa, despite the family believed her to have been 117 or 118 when she died. Temporary with youngest age claimed, she still in top 100, addendum is not needed
Top
Jared
Posted: May 21 2012, 11:00 PM


BANNED


Group: Banned
Posts: 796
Member No.: 1,184
Joined: 20-September 11



Nope.
Top
Brendan
Posted: May 21 2012, 11:34 PM


Radioactivity


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 2,779
Member No.: 1,020
Joined: 28-July 10



Graham is a grandfathered case validated with lower standards not used today, the most interesting being the issue with none of her documents coming within the 20-year rule. I would regard this a FALSE case.
Top
Futurist
Posted: May 23 2012, 03:56 PM


Methuselah


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 8,116
Member No.: 1,176
Joined: 6-September 11



QUOTE (Brendan @ May 21 2012, 11:34 PM)
Graham is a grandfathered case validated with lower standards not used today, the most interesting being the issue with none of her documents coming within the 20-year rule. I would regard this a FALSE case.

Basically this. Graham was highly likely to have been around 102 at the time of her death. That's the only way that she could have had one child in her teenage years and another child in her late 40s.
Top
vic726
Posted: May 24 2012, 01:26 AM


Christina Aguilera


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 518
Member No.: 1,188
Joined: 6-October 11



QUOTE (Futurist @ May 23 2012, 03:56 PM)
QUOTE (Brendan @ May 21 2012, 11:34 PM)
Graham is a grandfathered case validated with lower standards not used today, the most interesting being the issue with none of her documents coming within the 20-year rule. I would regard this a FALSE case.

Basically this. Graham was highly likely to have been around 102 at the time of her death. That's the only way that she could have had one child in her teenage years and another child in her late 40s.

Where does "102" come from? I have only heard that from Carrie C.White's case?
Top
Futurist
Posted: May 24 2012, 02:16 AM


Methuselah


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 8,116
Member No.: 1,176
Joined: 6-September 11



QUOTE (vic726 @ May 24 2012, 01:26 AM)
QUOTE (Futurist @ May 23 2012, 03:56 PM)
QUOTE (Brendan @ May 21 2012, 11:34 PM)
Graham is a grandfathered case validated with lower standards not used today, the most interesting being the issue with none of her documents coming within the 20-year rule. I would regard this a FALSE case.

Basically this. Graham was highly likely to have been around 102 at the time of her death. That's the only way that she could have had one child in her teenage years and another child in her late 40s.

Where does "102" come from? I have only heard that from Carrie C.White's case?

There's a thread somewhere in this forum where Calvin did some research and came up with this age. I don't know exactly where this thread is right now, but feel free to ask Calvin or someone else or look for it yourself.
Top
Donovan
Posted: May 24 2012, 05:18 AM


Donovan


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 2,180
Member No.: 1,172
Joined: 27-August 11



The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.
Top
vic726
Posted: May 24 2012, 05:30 AM


Christina Aguilera


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 518
Member No.: 1,188
Joined: 6-October 11



QUOTE (Donovan @ May 24 2012, 05:18 AM)
The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.

I see, that meant her age was exaggerated by at least 8 years ?!
Top
Follower
Posted: May 24 2012, 10:53 AM


Supercentenarian


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 147
Member No.: 1,216
Joined: 23-November 11



QUOTE (Donovan @ May 24 2012, 12:18 PM)
The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.

I'm wondering if any disputed cases will ever be removed.. dry.gif
Top
Pieter
Posted: May 24 2012, 11:02 AM


Jiroemon Kimura


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 4,483
Member No.: 1,066
Joined: 16-January 11



QUOTE (vic726 @ May 24 2012, 12:30 PM)
QUOTE (Donovan @ May 24 2012, 05:18 AM)
The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.

I see, that meant her age was exaggerated by at least 8 years ?!

Why shocked?

Some cases are exaggerated by more than 10 years...
Top
Brendan
Posted: May 24 2012, 11:16 AM


Radioactivity


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 2,779
Member No.: 1,020
Joined: 28-July 10



Interestingly, Martha Graham's death certificate notes her as having been born on 15 April 1841 and having died on 24 June 1959 — a claim to 118 years 70 days.
Top
vic726
Posted: May 25 2012, 03:10 AM


Christina Aguilera


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 518
Member No.: 1,188
Joined: 6-October 11



QUOTE (Pieter @ May 24 2012, 11:02 AM)
QUOTE (vic726 @ May 24 2012, 12:30 PM)
QUOTE (Donovan @ May 24 2012, 05:18 AM)
The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.

I see, that meant her age was exaggerated by at least 8 years ?!

Why shocked?

Some cases are exaggerated by more than 10 years...

I imagined that she was like Kamato Hongo, who was at least 110 at death...
Top
AMZ1981
Posted: May 26 2012, 09:07 AM


Supercentenarian


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 121
Member No.: 1,037
Joined: 10-October 10



At present there are five disputed cases on the list; Carrie White, Kamato Hongo, Anatica Butariu, Matthew Beard and Martha Graham so at least four are needed in the addendum. However consensus has changed several times as to whether her month of birth is properly validated.

Essentially the case would not be accepted now due to a lack of proper documentation, the GRG (I believe) no longer list the case themselves and Robert Young has described her as a `junk case` - enough for it to be disputed with a fifth name in the addendum.

However her case is historically important as she was believed to be the oldest person ever recorded from 1958 until she was surpassed by Shigechiyo Izumi in 1979/ 80. It's worth noting that her Wikipedia article is woefully inaccurate, claiming she was surpassed as oldest person ever by Jeanne Calment - even if the disputed cases inbetween (Izumi, White) are discounted Ann Eliza Williams was the one who superseded her.
Top
ryoung122
Posted: May 26 2012, 12:58 PM


Advisor


Group: Advisor
Posts: 4,166
Member No.: 17
Joined: 23-October 07



QUOTE (AMZ1981 @ May 26 2012, 09:07 AM)
At present there are five disputed cases on the list; Carrie White, Kamato Hongo, Anatica Butariu, Matthew Beard and Martha Graham so at least four are needed. However consensus has changed several times as to whether her month of birth is properly validated.

Essentially the case would not be accepted now due to a lack of proper documentation, the GRG (I believe) no longer list the case themselves and Robert Young has described her as a `junk case` - enough for it to be disputed with a fifth name in the addendum.

However her case is historically important as she believed to be the oldest person ever recorded from 1958 until she was surpassed by Shigechiyo Izumi in 1979/ 80. It's worth noting that her Wikipedia article is woefully inaccurate, claiming she was surpassed as oldest person ever by Jeanne Calment - even if the disputed cases inbetween (Izumi, White) are discounted Ann Eliza Williams was the one who superseded her.

That's not quite right. This case wasn't added to GWR lists until the 1980s, when it was transferred from the footnotes to the main section.

The reality is that this is a case that should not be included in the Wikipedia Top 100 list at all.
Top
Futurist
Posted: May 26 2012, 01:52 PM


Methuselah


Group: Trusted Members
Posts: 8,116
Member No.: 1,176
Joined: 6-September 11



QUOTE (vic726 @ May 25 2012, 03:10 AM)
QUOTE (Pieter @ May 24 2012, 11:02 AM)
QUOTE (vic726 @ May 24 2012, 12:30 PM)
QUOTE (Donovan @ May 24 2012, 05:18 AM)
The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.

I see, that meant her age was exaggerated by at least 8 years ?!

Why shocked?

Some cases are exaggerated by more than 10 years...

I imagined that she was like Kamato Hongo, who was at least 110 at death...

Kamato Hongo was at least 107-108 at the time of her death, not 110. Of course, she could have been age 110-112 at the time of her death, but she could have also been 107-109.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1149 seconds | Archive