Help
Search
Members
Calendar
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Welcome to The 110 Club. We hope you enjoy your visit. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you will be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Once you have registered, please post in "Welcome Center" to request administrator validation. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| toanglobal |
Posted: May 21 2012, 10:21 PM
|
|
Top Ten Group: Trusted Members Posts: 292 Member No.: 1,202 Joined: 29-October 11 |
I think in the list of 100 undisputedly oldest women only need to have three addendum cases rather than 4, Martha Graham is proven to live at least 114 years 180 days circa, despite the family believed her to have been 117 or 118 when she died. Temporary with youngest age claimed, she still in top 100, addendum is not needed
|
| Jared |
Posted: May 21 2012, 11:00 PM
|
|
BANNED Group: Banned Posts: 796 Member No.: 1,184 Joined: 20-September 11 |
Nope.
|
| Brendan |
Posted: May 21 2012, 11:34 PM
|
|
Radioactivity Group: Trusted Members Posts: 2,779 Member No.: 1,020 Joined: 28-July 10 |
Graham is a grandfathered case validated with lower standards not used today, the most interesting being the issue with none of her documents coming within the 20-year rule. I would regard this a FALSE case.
|
| Futurist |
Posted: May 23 2012, 03:56 PM
|
||
|
Methuselah Group: Trusted Members Posts: 8,116 Member No.: 1,176 Joined: 6-September 11 |
Basically this. Graham was highly likely to have been around 102 at the time of her death. That's the only way that she could have had one child in her teenage years and another child in her late 40s. |
||
| vic726 |
Posted: May 24 2012, 01:26 AM
|
||||
|
Christina Aguilera Group: Trusted Members Posts: 518 Member No.: 1,188 Joined: 6-October 11 |
Where does "102" come from? I have only heard that from Carrie C.White's case? |
||||
| Futurist |
Posted: May 24 2012, 02:16 AM
|
||||||
|
Methuselah Group: Trusted Members Posts: 8,116 Member No.: 1,176 Joined: 6-September 11 |
There's a thread somewhere in this forum where Calvin did some research and came up with this age. I don't know exactly where this thread is right now, but feel free to ask Calvin or someone else or look for it yourself. |
||||||
| Donovan |
Posted: May 24 2012, 05:18 AM
|
|
Donovan Group: Trusted Members Posts: 2,180 Member No.: 1,172 Joined: 27-August 11 |
The thread was started by Dakota and we have found out that Mrs Graham could be born between 1852 and 1859, making her 99-106 at her death in 1959. She should be removed.
|
| vic726 |
Posted: May 24 2012, 05:30 AM
|
||
|
Christina Aguilera Group: Trusted Members Posts: 518 Member No.: 1,188 Joined: 6-October 11 |
I see, that meant her age was exaggerated by at least 8 years ?! |
||
| Follower |
Posted: May 24 2012, 10:53 AM
|
||
|
Supercentenarian Group: Trusted Members Posts: 147 Member No.: 1,216 Joined: 23-November 11 |
I'm wondering if any disputed cases will ever be removed.. |
||
| Pieter |
Posted: May 24 2012, 11:02 AM
|
||||
|
Jiroemon Kimura Group: Trusted Members Posts: 4,483 Member No.: 1,066 Joined: 16-January 11 |
Why shocked? Some cases are exaggerated by more than 10 years... |
||||
| Brendan |
Posted: May 24 2012, 11:16 AM
|
|
Radioactivity Group: Trusted Members Posts: 2,779 Member No.: 1,020 Joined: 28-July 10 |
Interestingly, Martha Graham's death certificate notes her as having been born on 15 April 1841 and having died on 24 June 1959 — a claim to 118 years 70 days.
|
| vic726 |
Posted: May 25 2012, 03:10 AM
|
||||||
|
Christina Aguilera Group: Trusted Members Posts: 518 Member No.: 1,188 Joined: 6-October 11 |
I imagined that she was like Kamato Hongo, who was at least 110 at death... |
||||||
| AMZ1981 |
Posted: May 26 2012, 09:07 AM
|
|
Supercentenarian Group: Trusted Members Posts: 121 Member No.: 1,037 Joined: 10-October 10 |
At present there are five disputed cases on the list; Carrie White, Kamato Hongo, Anatica Butariu, Matthew Beard and Martha Graham so at least four are needed in the addendum. However consensus has changed several times as to whether her month of birth is properly validated.
Essentially the case would not be accepted now due to a lack of proper documentation, the GRG (I believe) no longer list the case themselves and Robert Young has described her as a `junk case` - enough for it to be disputed with a fifth name in the addendum. However her case is historically important as she was believed to be the oldest person ever recorded from 1958 until she was surpassed by Shigechiyo Izumi in 1979/ 80. It's worth noting that her Wikipedia article is woefully inaccurate, claiming she was surpassed as oldest person ever by Jeanne Calment - even if the disputed cases inbetween (Izumi, White) are discounted Ann Eliza Williams was the one who superseded her. |
| ryoung122 |
Posted: May 26 2012, 12:58 PM
|
||
|
Advisor Group: Advisor Posts: 4,166 Member No.: 17 Joined: 23-October 07 |
That's not quite right. This case wasn't added to GWR lists until the 1980s, when it was transferred from the footnotes to the main section. The reality is that this is a case that should not be included in the Wikipedia Top 100 list at all. |
||
| Futurist |
Posted: May 26 2012, 01:52 PM
|
||||||||
|
Methuselah Group: Trusted Members Posts: 8,116 Member No.: 1,176 Joined: 6-September 11 |
Kamato Hongo was at least 107-108 at the time of her death, not 110. Of course, she could have been age 110-112 at the time of her death, but she could have also been 107-109. |
||||||||
Pages: (2) [1] 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |