Warhammer Forge "fixes" The Destroyer, Well, kinda.
| · Forum Rules: Do Not Break Them · Portal |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
 | Welcome to Da Warpath. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Newz: |
   |
Warhammer Forge "fixes" The Destroyer, Well, kinda.| theorox |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 01:56 PM
|
 Decidedly Average  Group: Trial Moderators Posts: 4,942 Member No.: 5,753 Joined: 21-April 10  |
The new Tamurkhan FAQ changes the much bemoaned K'daii Destroyer's "-1 to all wound rolls" rule to "successful wounds must be re-rolled". Well, at least now anyone can wound him like they should be able to...but really, most regular troops will be wounding him on 6's and re-rolling that, so that odd chance of wounding him probably won't matter.
 For troops with Str5-7 the odds of getting a wound in actually got worse, apparently.Just to inform you guys. What do you think about this change? Theo |
  
|
| Piccolo |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 02:14 PM
|
 Orc  Group: Members Posts: 560 Member No.: 5,534 Joined: 26-October 09 |
maybe its a stupid question but where can I find the Tamurkhan FAQ?
|
|
|
| Snikpik |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 02:21 PM
|
 Warboss  Group: Global Moderators Posts: 2,221 Member No.: 5,376 Joined: 1-July 09 |
Its just as silly as Theo wanting us to hand over our fincast models to him on the cheap!
 |
|
|
| theorox |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 03:55 PM
|
||
|
Decidedly Average Group: Trial Moderators Posts: 4,942 Member No.: 5,753 Joined: 21-April 10 |
|
||
|
|
| Piccolo |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 04:49 PM
|
|
Orc Group: Members Posts: 560 Member No.: 5,534 Joined: 26-October 09 |
ty so much Theo
 |
|
|
| Craze_b0i |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 07:33 PM
|
 Warboss  Group: Members Posts: 2,492 Member No.: 5,714 Joined: 12-March 10 |
Just clicked the link, but can't find the reference to Kdaii Destroyer.
 |
|
|
| theorox |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 07:57 PM
|
||
|
Decidedly Average Group: Trial Moderators Posts: 4,942 Member No.: 5,753 Joined: 21-April 10 |
It's at the very top. In big red letters. People on this forum don't have eyes!  Theo |
||
|
|
| Wechselbalg |
Posted: Jun 10 2012, 10:19 PM
|
 Orc Group: Members Posts: 435 Member No.: 6,442 Joined: 26-July 11 |
Doesnt the BRB says that no matter what modifiers take place a 6 always wounds?
I mean, there are other cases where you "cant" wound a character except for the "6 always wound rule". - 1 to wound is sick, but the new one is even more sick. The destroyer is tough as an ork shoe so rerolling those wounds is just  Oh, you got a 6, your only chance to wound my destroyer with everything but elite gw carrying troops and high str stuff? Guess what, you have to reroll. |
|
|
| Craze_b0i |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 03:17 PM
|
||||||
|
Warboss Group: Members Posts: 2,492 Member No.: 5,714 Joined: 12-March 10 |
My bad. Saw the first bit about flaming damage but failed to notice the final sentence at the end.  As you say the new ruling fixes one problem and creates another. S5 is now 11% rather than 16%, S6 is now 25% rather than 33%. They should have just said 6 always wounds (assuming this rule doesn't already exist).
Can't find that anywhere in BRB. Not in FAQs either. |
||||||
|
|
| Wechselbalg |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 04:53 PM
|
|
Orc Group: Members Posts: 435 Member No.: 6,442 Joined: 26-July 11 |
My bad, just counts for the hits not the wounds. So the rule change was pretty good.
|
|
|
 |
|
