How much wood?
| · Portal |
 Help
 Search
 Members
 Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) [1] 2 ( Go to first unread post ) |    |
How much wood?| Foe Hammer |
 Posted on Feb 16 2004, 09:02 PM
|
|
Grunt  Group: Members Posts: 55 Member No.: 36 Joined: 10-February 04  |
please give opinions and estimates.
|
 
|
| Fenix |
Posted on Feb 17 2004, 08:06 AM
|
|
Sarge Group: Admin Posts: 184 Member No.: 2 Joined: 22-November 03 |
**NO FLAMING! - DF**
|
|
| DarkFish |
Posted on Feb 17 2004, 09:15 AM
|
|
Marine Group: Admin Posts: 144 Member No.: 1 Joined: 22-November 03 |
Well I think we can safely say that given the relative densities of the wood, and the chuck. That it would obviously be able to chuck more than its own weight in wood.
Taking this as a given, I quote Wurmple's Ornithology: "A wood chuck weighs a little over 20 grams". This being the case, all the evidence points to the answer being somewhere between 20 grams and 2 billion tonnes. Given this completely conclusive evidence, I think we can safely put the real value at 1 Imperial Tonne |
|
| Fenix |
Posted on Feb 17 2004, 10:29 PM
|
|
Sarge Group: Admin Posts: 184 Member No.: 2 Joined: 22-November 03 |
I will flame as much as a like when silly fools like Foe Hammer put up stupid posts like this
**Not while I run these forums - DF** |
|
|
| plaz |
Posted on Feb 19 2004, 03:03 PM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 22 Member No.: 13 Joined: 8-December 03 |
 I love the definate results you were able to come to DF! Excellent deduction. |
|
|
| NX Kerensky |
Posted on Feb 27 2004, 09:02 PM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 26 Member No.: 26 Joined: 25-January 04 |
No offense, DF, but you won't run them much longer.
|
|
|
| Fenix |
Posted on Feb 29 2004, 04:36 PM
|
|
Sarge Group: Admin Posts: 184 Member No.: 2 Joined: 22-November 03 |
The *real* question is
How much Chuck could a Chuck-Chuck-Chuck, if a Chuck-Chuck-Chucl could chuck Chuck-Chucks |
|
|
| DarkFish |
Posted on Feb 29 2004, 11:27 PM
|
|
Marine Group: Admin Posts: 144 Member No.: 1 Joined: 22-November 03 |
No, you got it wrong. How many chucks could a chuck-chucker chuck if a chuck-chucker could chuck chucks
|
|
|
| Fenix |
Posted on Mar 1 2004, 06:57 PM
|
|
Sarge Group: Admin Posts: 184 Member No.: 2 Joined: 22-November 03 |
No, i was making reference to the all obscure Chuck-Chuck-Chuck, an invention of Fighter I think its 4 chucks in each hand
|
|
|
| Foe Hammer |
Posted on Mar 4 2004, 09:04 PM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 55 Member No.: 36 Joined: 10-February 04 |
The chuck-chuck-chuck is quote: "two nun-chucks chained together to provide extra chuckyness and the option of a throwing-chuck."
|
|
|
| NX Kerensky |
Posted on Mar 6 2004, 06:15 PM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 26 Member No.: 26 Joined: 25-January 04 |
Nunchaku. Not nun-chucks. Trust me, if it's in Ninja Gaiden, it's gotta be true. That game pwns.
 |
|
|
| Foe Hammer |
Posted on Mar 13 2004, 11:03 AM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 55 Member No.: 36 Joined: 10-February 04 |
HEY, were ENGLISH! Whatever we say is, therefore, the English language!
I will not have some poncey japanese telling me to to spell _MY_ words! Nun-Chucks is the accepted Englisah spelling, therefore Nun-Chuchs IS the word!  |
|
|
| DarkFish |
Posted on Mar 13 2004, 02:26 PM
|
|
Marine Group: Admin Posts: 144 Member No.: 1 Joined: 22-November 03 |
 |
|
|
| NX Kerensky |
Posted on Mar 15 2004, 02:13 PM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 26 Member No.: 26 Joined: 25-January 04 |
I'm not japanese! I'm Canadian and proud of it! I'm just saying that Ninja Gaiden says it, and at one point, so does Dungeon Keeper! If only there were ninjas in Halo, then I could prove it!
By the way... Englisah?! Nun-Chuchs?!!? That is NOT a real part of the english language. Show me that in the Oxford Dictionary!  |
|
|
| Foe Hammer |
Posted on Mar 15 2004, 09:18 PM
|
|
Grunt Group: Members Posts: 55 Member No.: 36 Joined: 10-February 04 |
Show me the words audatiousness, derasterise, clifton, reantidisestablishmentarialism and pneumoultramicrosilicovolcanosis in the oxford dictionary. These are all english words. English is an amazing language. you can put any prefix onto any word and it has a whole new meaning! similarly with suffixes. i can think of a word that isnt in the Dictionary right now!.....disindicatory -a thing which activley does not indicate another thing. I apologise to all those who speak english, but are not, but someone like myslelf with sufficient knowledge of the english language can tell you, very truthfully, that is a word is used frequently and by everyone, it becomes a part of our language, like the use of the word "sale" to descrabe a lowering in prices. This only came into being when there were shops big and desprate enough to have sales.
Oh, and if you can find the correct spelling of Nun-Chucks in the Oxford dictionarry, post your e-mail, and ill give you a reward.  |
|
|
 Pages: (2) [1] 2 |
|
