| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
InvisionFree gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now | Welcome to Major League Hockey: NHL Season is Starting!. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Canadiens |
Posted: Apr 24 2012, 05:14 AM
|
|
MVP Group: Admin Posts: 471 Member No.: 27 Joined: 18-July 10 |
Alright guys we have made a couple of good changes for the upcoming season.
Here is a spot for all GM's to post suggestions for any additional tweaks to the league. If you have something you think may benefit us please post it here. |
| Penguins |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 07:39 PM
|
|
Legend Group: Admin Posts: 656 Member No.: 24 Joined: 15-July 10 |
Anyone have any more ideas? Anyone want to tweak the cap? Positions? Scoring?
|
| Rangers |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 08:02 PM
|
|
SuperStar Group: Members Posts: 239 Member No.: 23 Joined: 13-July 10 |
Is it worth mentioning my proportional cap idea again?
I think I had proposed a 140% cap in the past, but a 135% cap would probably work too. So, what does this mean? Instead of adding $25m to whatever the NHL cap is, we'd simply multiply the NHL cap by 1.4 (or 1.35). This would cover us for future cap increases. Say the cap eventually rises to $120m. Our $25m buffer would only represent a 21% increase over the NHL's salary cap. Right now it is at about 36%. With a proportional cap, our league will have more flexibility and will never get to the point where every team is handcuffed financially. |
| Sharks |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 08:18 PM
|
||
|
Hall of Famer Group: Members Posts: 629 Member No.: 19 Joined: 11-May 08 |
Whats the point of having a cap then if its going to be at a ridiculous amount? If you manage your team you won't have a cap issue. Just my 0.02 |
||
| Penguins |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 09:12 PM
|
||||
|
Legend Group: Admin Posts: 656 Member No.: 24 Joined: 15-July 10 |
Actually using NHL SAL CAP X 1.4, it is pretty much the same as the $25 mil over we used this season. We can put it to vote and see where everyone stands. |
||||
| Rangers |
Posted: Jun 11 2012, 11:14 PM
|
||||||
|
SuperStar Group: Members Posts: 239 Member No.: 23 Joined: 13-July 10 |
The change wouldn't increase the cap. Instead, it would make the cap flexible. If this league is around in three years, a change in the way we calculate our cap will be needed. My plan would be a proactive move in anticipation of future NHL cap increases. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |