I'd like to get your opinions on David Hicks, the accused Australian terrorist being held at Guantanamo Bay.
If you don't know, David is an accused terrorist who has been held at Guantanamo Bay Prison for five years without release and hasn't been charged with any crimes yet. Originally, Australians had been unconcerned with Hicks' plight, but recently, the public has made efforts to get him home.
In light of this, it seems, the Bush Administration has charged Hicks with providing material support to Terrorists that threaten the safety of America (ie. Al Quaida or however you spell it). Hicks is being trialed by a military commission in America and has been denied any civilian lawyers. In light of this information, he has pleaded guilty to the charges in the hopes that he may spend his sentence in Australia.
(for more information search up David Hicks at wikipedia)
I personally believed that this was a ridiculous fabrication about Hicks. My summary of events is a bit biased, so wikipedia would give you a better side of the story. But every single Australian politician in the Government has been asked to attempt to bring Hicks home, and all of them have dodged the questions, never giving a true answer and never saying outright that they believe Hicks is guilty or not guilty. The evidence that Hicks is a terrorist might be there, but the Bush Administration has had this information for five years, and they've left this man to rot, without even charging him despite all their information.
I just think its really wrong but I'd like to hear what you guys have to say.