Tau In Apocalypse, anyone else think we got shafted?| · Board Rules · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Welcome to Kovash Tauva Forum Archive. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
Tau In Apocalypse, anyone else think we got shafted?| Nevermore |
Posted: Oct 31 2007, 01:50 AM
|
![]() Aun'O Purevoice, Grand Celestial for the Shi'Kara Sept Group: The Ethereals Posts: 1,319 Member No.: 659 Joined: 26-November 05 |
Does anyone else think we got pretty screwed over in Apocalypse? I mean we only got 2 new units, both of which we already had in Forgeworld stuff, and only 2 battle formations, and those seem pretty weak to me.
Yeah, D3 free markerlight hits a turn is nice, and our formations don't cost many points, but the imperial formations get loads of extra strategic assets or their tanks can ignore some damage results. It just feels to me like we got hosed. -------------------- Once Upon A Midnight Dreary...
|
| Der Mond |
Posted: Oct 31 2007, 01:54 AM
|
||
|
Colonel Mond the Tanker Group: Shas'el Posts: 350 Member No.: 860 Joined: 11-November 06 |
Yeah, GW hates the Tau and Dark Eldar. Both get screwed over in every expansion of the game.
I kind of like the massed hordes of suits though. It looks like fun. Maybe I will try it. --------------------
|
||
| Nevermore |
Posted: Oct 31 2007, 01:57 AM
|
![]() Aun'O Purevoice, Grand Celestial for the Shi'Kara Sept Group: The Ethereals Posts: 1,319 Member No.: 659 Joined: 26-November 05 |
About all the Rapid Insertion Force does is deep strike well, and my experience has been that suits that deep strike get killed.
I always have much better luck deploying my suits and moving them up quickly, behind cover. Maybe on one of those big apocalypse boards though it would work better. -------------------- Once Upon A Midnight Dreary...
|
| Der Mond |
Posted: Oct 31 2007, 02:14 AM
|
||
|
Colonel Mond the Tanker Group: Shas'el Posts: 350 Member No.: 860 Joined: 11-November 06 |
Yeah it probably would work better on a bigger board.
--------------------
|
||
| jik_ff |
Posted: Oct 31 2007, 06:36 PM
|
![]() Group: Shas'el Posts: 260 Member No.: 887 Joined: 6-December 06 |
Though I don't use deep strike often, Deep Strike isn't just about putting units in behind the enemy as I see it. A proper Deep Strike can put some new firepower in a convenient location for you to cause some damage. Deep Striking units to flank (not necessarily behind) the enemy. Use missle pods for range firing so you don't need to be right up against them.
Deep Strike doesn't always = suicide. -------------------- <]BOMBS AWAY[>
|
| Master shaper Kortez |
Posted: Oct 31 2007, 10:23 PM
|
|
Group: Shas'el Posts: 278 Member No.: 547 Joined: 27-June 05 |
the tau haven't been screwed IMO but what you have to consider is this. In anormal game you cannot afford to deepstrike suits in just for them to be killed but in large apocalypse battles it is more a case of errrm im going to lose lots of stuff anyway by putting my suits first in line can i make the sacrifice worth the points?
Also GW have loads of data sheets in the works so you can expect more stuff to come out maybe even some new allies or at least rules for old ones :> Who knows Seriously its just about a new way of thinking. I have had to change my Eldar army so suit apocalypse better and it does just fine try and get a few games in and try different things out. -------------------- |
| Shas'Ui Jais |
Posted: Nov 23 2007, 01:40 AM
|
![]() Group: Shas'vre Posts: 164 Member No.: 758 Joined: 24-April 06 |
The Tau need a Super Heavy unit BIG TIME!!
-------------------- For the Greater Good!! |
| Eetion |
Posted: Nov 23 2007, 10:01 AM
|
|
Group: Shas'la Posts: 36 Member No.: 918 Joined: 26-January 07 |
Buy a Manta...
Or add in a some Gue'vesa troops and Guevessa BaneBlade... Hmm Model a BaneBlade with RailCannons? The TigersharksAX-1-0 could do the trick as well. Titan Killing Rail Guns. This post has been edited by Eetion on Nov 23 2007, 10:01 AM -------------------- "Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponents fate."
Sun Tzu Tau Commanders! Interested in playing in Online Campaigns? Then the Cadre needs your help. Join us in the fight for the Greater Good. |
| Shas'ral'ta |
Posted: Nov 23 2007, 03:41 PM
|
![]() Adam Group: The Ethereals Posts: 885 Member No.: 100 Joined: 13-March 04 |
The insertion force is amazing, i played it against my friend's chaos army, lets just say I loaded em with plasma and come the third turn or so... those berserkers holding the right flank were not in good shape.
I dont think the tau got scrued over, big games is kindof where the tau really shine anyway. Plus you can take any of the normal strategic assets that anyone else can take. Along with that, you can use any unit now, so I plan to buy a baneblade for my Gue'vesa devision i'm gonna be starting. Also there is no force organisation chart, so when we threw armies together a couple weeks back to do a teams apoc battle. My army consisted of 12 crisis suits, my commander, 6 broadsides, and 4 hammerheads. -------------------- Ninjas R' Awesome
(and Kovash Tau'va rules) |
| Der Mond |
Posted: Nov 24 2007, 12:01 AM
|
||
|
Colonel Mond the Tanker Group: Shas'el Posts: 350 Member No.: 860 Joined: 11-November 06 |
I have yet to play with a baneblade at the side of my tau army. Oh well, maybe one day...
--------------------
|
||