This skin was created by Kazuki of the IF Skin Zone



Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 50 Cal Machine Gun Remotely Operated - PN
21Scorpio
Posted: May 19 2005, 11:10 AM


Sargento Vice Primero
*

Group: Rangers
Posts: 126
Member No.: 321
Joined: 14-February 05



The re-deployment of repaired navy ships is a good news but even better is the news that the navy through self reliance program was able to make a 50 cal machine gun automatic or remotely operated. This is very impt bcoz it will lessen casualty but with improved accuracy. It uses camera to focus on its target and a sort of fire control do the rest.

Navy top brass wants this to the standard small waepon on its ships.. specool.gif
Top
possible
Posted: May 19 2005, 12:32 PM


Teniente Coronel
*

Group: Special Forces
Posts: 798
Member No.: 414
Joined: 26-March 05



i agree. makes more sense against terrs and smugglers than Spike missiles.


--------------------
user posted image

War. What is it good for?--James Brown

What's love got to do with it?--Tina Turner

Only the intelligent are brave.
Top
Rapidfire
Posted: May 19 2005, 12:35 PM


Professional Toy Gun Technician
*

Group: Special Forces
Posts: 375
Member No.: 445
Joined: 22-April 05



QUOTE (21Scorpio @ May 19 2005, 11:10 AM)
The re-deployment of repaired navy ships is a good news but even better is the news that the navy through self reliance program was able to make a 50 cal machine gun automatic or remotely operated. This is very impt bcoz it will lessen casualty but with improved accuracy. It uses camera to focus on its target and a sort of fire control do the rest.

Navy top brass wants this to the standard small waepon on its ships.. specool.gif

is this really an indigenous development?
Top
possible
Posted: May 19 2005, 12:40 PM


Teniente Coronel
*

Group: Special Forces
Posts: 798
Member No.: 414
Joined: 26-March 05



instead of missiles, better for the PN to upgrade existing assets with better sensors and more systems of this type like the the ones they're installing on the JACINTO-class courtesy of MSI-Defence.


--------------------
user posted image

War. What is it good for?--James Brown

What's love got to do with it?--Tina Turner

Only the intelligent are brave.
Top
saver111
Posted: May 19 2005, 03:28 PM


PDFF Moderator
*

Group: PDFF ModGroup
Posts: 5,910
Member No.: 408
Joined: 23-March 05



user posted image

No protective cover from enemy fire?


--------------------
"In the interest of National Defense...

user posted image

"Ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country!"
Top
flipzi
Posted: May 19 2005, 03:39 PM


R-A-T-S
*

Group: PDFF ModGroup
Posts: 6,564
Member No.: 71
Joined: 8-August 04



NICE JOB AGAIN, NAVY! thumb.gif thumb.gif

QUOTE
No protective cover from enemy fire?


That concern should be checked also.

The Navy engineers must try to do something to protect the assembly from hostile fire, just like the canons on Peacock-class ships.


--------------------
user posted image

" Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them! - Art. II Sec 1, Philippine Constitution "


" People don't care what we know until they know we care. "


getflipzi@yahoo.com
Top
Ventisei26
Posted: May 19 2005, 05:37 PM


Soldado Distinguido
*

Group: Provisionals
Posts: 43
Member No.: 421
Joined: 6-April 05



QUOTE (saver111 @ May 19 2005, 03:28 PM)
No protective cover from enemy fire?

I don't know if you read the note below the picture. It says, "an automated 50-caliber machine gun mounted on the deck of a patrol craft equipped with a camera operated from inside the vessel."

So hindi na kailangan ng protective cover dahil the 50-cal MG is NOT operated manually. The personnel who is operating the MG is very well protected because he is inside the vessel.

On the other hand, and kailangan ng protection ay yung camera, dahil pag natamaan yung ng bala, useless na dahil hindi na makikita ang kalaban. I wonder if the lens of the camera is bulletproof.

OR your concern is the protection of the machine gun?

This post has been edited by Ventisei26 on May 19 2005, 05:38 PM


--------------------
user posted image
Top
flipzi
Posted: May 19 2005, 05:42 PM


R-A-T-S
*

Group: PDFF ModGroup
Posts: 6,564
Member No.: 71
Joined: 8-August 04



QUOTE (Ventisei26 @ May 19 2005, 05:37 PM)


OR your concern is the protection of the machine gun?

Not exactly the gun, but the assembly that makes it automated.

QUOTE
and kailangan ng protection ay yung camera, dahil pag natamaan yung ng bala, useless na dahil hindi na makikita ang kalaban.


Plus the wires and the control rods or arms may be damaged also. That's why i was asking if it's possible to put a covering or enclosure for the assembly.


--------------------
user posted image

" Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them! - Art. II Sec 1, Philippine Constitution "


" People don't care what we know until they know we care. "


getflipzi@yahoo.com
Top
saver111
Posted: May 19 2005, 05:45 PM


PDFF Moderator
*

Group: PDFF ModGroup
Posts: 5,910
Member No.: 408
Joined: 23-March 05



thumb.gif thumb.gif thumb.gif


--------------------
"In the interest of National Defense...

user posted image

"Ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country!"
Top
Numbers
Posted: May 19 2005, 07:56 PM


Gial de Division
*

Group: PDFF ModGroup
Posts: 3,308
Member No.: 9
Joined: 9-July 04



Flipzi is right, the wires are exposed, it should be protected by steel plate enclosure.

The weapon can simply be made inoperable when a wire is cut by shrapnel, or plain sabotage.

bow.gif Excellent effort by the PN though.

Sariling sikap!


--------------------
One little two little three little four little...

Behind every successful man, there is a woman
And behind every unsuccessful man, there are two.

A bus station is where a bus stops.
A train station is where a train stops.
On my desk, I have a work station....
Top
pantherscout78
Posted: May 19 2005, 10:13 PM


Sargento Segundo
*

Group: Rangers
Posts: 104
Member No.: 303
Joined: 20-January 05



QUOTE (saver111 @ May 19 2005, 03:28 PM)
user posted image

No protective cover from enemy fire?

guys, jus a question? what are the classifcation of this vessels?

do they have sonar?

speed, range and endurance too if u have any..

thanks.. AR15firing.gif
Top
ColdDeadFish
Posted: May 20 2005, 12:05 AM


Coronel
*

Group: Analysts
Posts: 938
Member No.: 153
Joined: 4-October 04



QUOTE (saver111 @ May 19 2005, 03:28 PM)
user posted image

No protective cover from enemy fire?

OH MY GOD!

they mounted servos on this gun mount?

No recoil damper rails?

Where is the camera?

What is provision for elevation and windage compensation?

Will that cross bolt hold as it is mounted near the fulcrum of the azlev mount?

I bet they mounted the azimuth motor in the center of that mount and that acme screw in the right side will not hold.




--------------------
user posted image
Top
Singa Lion
Posted: May 20 2005, 10:24 AM


Capitan
*

Group: Paratroops
Posts: 343
Member No.: 20
Joined: 13-July 04



cdf i dont think your navy is that dumb enough to install that gun on the ship without first testing it , if its there then they already have tested it and found it to work ok thumb.gif


--------------------
user posted image
The SAF is an armed force , not a civilian corporation. Its mission is to defeat its enemies, ruthlessly and completely. Its an instrument of controlled fury, designed to visit death and destruction of its foes...soldiers must have steel in their souls ..must learn in war to kill and not to flinch, to destroy and not to feel pity, to be a flaming sword in the righteous cause of national survival.
-BG Lee , 1984
Top
flipzi
Posted: May 20 2005, 11:47 AM


R-A-T-S
*

Group: PDFF ModGroup
Posts: 6,564
Member No.: 71
Joined: 8-August 04



QUOTE (pantherscout78 @ May 19 2005, 10:13 PM)

guys, jus a question? what are the classifcation of this vessels?

do they have sonar?

speed, range and endurance too if u have any..

thanks.. AR15firing.gif

From Opus224 www.geocities.com/opus224



Conrado Yap (SK Sea Hawk/Sea Killer) Class


PCF 840, 842-849, 851-853
Displacement: 74.5 tons full load
Length: 83.7 ft (25.5 m)
Speed: 38 knots
Range: 500 mi. at 20 knots
Crew: 3 officer + 12 enlisted
Armament:
1-Bofors 40mm/60
2-20mm Oerlikon (twin) Mk 16



Notes:

12 sold to the Philippines by South Korea at "friendship price" of US $100 each, in appreciation of Philippine soldiers who fought during the Korean War against China and North Korea. These vessels were built between 1975-78 and were transferred to the Philippine Navy in 1993. Armament fits may vary. Owing to its high speed, a naval interceptor task force is currently being formed utilizing 3 of this class to combat high-speed raiders, smugglers and pirates in the southern Philippines.



--------------------
user posted image

" Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them! - Art. II Sec 1, Philippine Constitution "


" People don't care what we know until they know we care. "


getflipzi@yahoo.com
Top
possible
Posted: May 20 2005, 10:58 PM


Teniente Coronel
*

Group: Special Forces
Posts: 798
Member No.: 414
Joined: 26-March 05



i agree with Singa Lion, though i sure as hell hope that's not the finished product; anyway it's the idea that counts.

baby steps, baby steps... crawling.gif

This post has been edited by possible on May 20 2005, 10:58 PM


--------------------
user posted image

War. What is it good for?--James Brown

What's love got to do with it?--Tina Turner

Only the intelligent are brave.
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1471 seconds | Archive
Search this site powered by FreeFind
free counters