meta or not

i hope tama papost ko, hehe


i'm proud to be anti-meta duelist

i want to be a Meta duelsit but in reality i'm not a meta duelist.. besides my BF deck, I doubt I play meta. I prefer non-meta nor Anti-meta gameplay.

BTW at one point sa Yugi ang Anti-meta ang Meta hahaha

i want to be meta yet the cards are i love are not meta xD

i am in my own legue and in my own world. whether meta or not me nots care.

just wished that people wont go copying the meta format for the sake of winning. >.>"

i agree mike, its better to make an original concept that can beat a meta deck rather than copying for the sake of winning

that's the true art of dueling for me, hehe

i agree mike, its better to make an original concept that can beat a meta deck rather than copying for the sake of winning

that's the true art of dueling for me, hehe

That's called netdecking, iba naman ang meta-play sa netdecking eh
meta just means popular choice of deck. So far sa Davao dili mi meta ni rein mwahahahaha ang meta Gladial beast lol.. may nalang wala pa Synchro Cat ug Gladial Cat, (kanang 2 ang common na gina netdeck kay gahi kaayo)

i agree mike, its better to make an original concept that can beat a meta deck rather than copying for the sake of winning

that's the true art of dueling for me, hehe

That's called netdecking, iba naman ang meta-play sa netdecking eh
meta just means popular choice of deck. So far sa Davao dili mi meta ni rein mwahahahaha ang meta Gladial beast lol.. may nalang wala pa Synchro Cat ug Gladial Cat, (kanang 2 ang common na gina netdeck kay gahi kaayo)

considered pa rin meta kayo, wla lng maxado BF bcoz of cards availability and lightsworn bcoz of rein, yun kc trademark decks nyo, kasali na rin gladiator jan, i stick pa rin sa anti Baboy deck, hehe

We refuse to take part in the Meta vs Anti-Meta war! It just makes a predator and prey relationship! We run neither meta nor Anti-Meta! But I sometimes wonder...Are we really avoiding the predator-prey thing...or are we subjecting ourselves to it by picking neither sides....

Meta is the top tier or most effective deck to win tournaments. No single card is a meta meaning broken cards are not Meta. Nor is it a bunch of generic cards pulled together, they are there for support nothing more. And lastly Meta is not sirocco, judgment dragon or gyzarus it is BF, LS and GB.

Meta is a deck not a card. It is carbon copy, net decked and mass produced! not my style. Meta is for winning not for fun. Meta Pawns because it is design to be. Meta Bullies because it has to. Meta sux balls on my King Tiger Wanghu and Royal Oppression bcoz most of them are screwed without SS.

note:
broken = are splashable, seemingly costless, 0 - 1, game breaking ban-able cards
ei. DaD, Heavy Storm, Monster Reborn, CCV etc.
generic = staples or commonly used cards. all broken cards can be generic but not all generic cards can be broken.

If I were to judge we don't have a Meta we just have a really badass, loud mouth player who really is very good at playing the game.

ps. I chose anti-meta btw for obvious reasons

<"z

i rest my case ^^