| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Swing Dangler |
Posted: Feb 20 2009, 07:27 AM
|
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 121 Member No.: 21 Joined: 14-January 08 |
New York Times Article
Cache this quick because I wouldn't be surprised if it gets memory holed. The key point I think other than the obvious is that the cousins actually did know each other, but the author implies not very well. The alleged hijacker's cousin is about one statement away from revealing a major truth behind 9/11. This could be spun in two ways: this is one reason Israel why was sending warnings to the U.S. government about a major attack because the two cousins openly talked. Chalk one up for the Israelis warning us. ...or Ziad was much like his cousin, playing the role of intel operative controlled by Mossad handlers whose goal was either infiltrating an alleged hijacker cell or playing the role of hijacker in a war game, or a Mossad controlled terrorist. It will be interesting to follow the story one way or another. Once Mossad always Mossad, right? A family that spies together dies together? |
| A.Marquis |
Posted: Feb 20 2009, 09:26 AM
|
||
|
A Regular Jim Garrison Group: Admin Posts: 1,521 Member No.: 2 Joined: 31-August 07 |
Oh give me an effing break. What are the chances? Seriously. Do they expect us to believe this horseshit? This sheds a very interesting light on Ziad. Either way whether he was framed, which it looks like, or he was Mossad this only adds to the reason why we need a new investigation into who the "hijackers" really were. |
||
| madtruth |
Posted: Feb 22 2009, 07:35 AM
|
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 967 Joined: 12-January 09 |
Like I said in another post on another forum.
This is just a coincidence! cough! coinicidence # 10,982 !! Horseshit is right. And every article is the same with it's freaking "but they didn't appear to know eachother very well" or "but officials don't think it's related",etc. The bs lies go on and on and on. Thru Dom's work and my and our own research, we already know the Jarrah connection & story's are all bs. Now this really confirms it. |
| JustAdream |
Posted: Mar 23 2009, 09:34 PM
|
||||||
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Banned Posts: 64 Member No.: 1,016 Joined: 7-March 09 |
All of the so called "hijackers" were assets of Mossad, and CIA, and were used to "leave a false trail of evidence" that would make it look like they were planning a terrorist act. They were probably recruited to take part in military hijack "drills" playing the "terrorists/actors" in the drill, and were told to do some basic training at flight schools. They weren't told however that they were being set up by Mossad, who were known to be trailing them. Some of the "hijackers" had fake ID's, and these ones were probably Mossad agents pretending to be terrorists. The genuine recruits were assets, then dupes, then patsies. None of them hijacked any planes on 9/11. It was all a set up. Ziad Jarrah is obviously a Mossad recruit. He wasn't religious at all, and went to a Catholic school when he was a kid. Are we supposed to believe that a non-religious guy, who's cousin is a Mossad agent, turned into a psychotic suicidal terrorists overnight willing to die for Allah? Oh brother The FBI supposedly found his "passport" intact in the wreckage of flight 93. The magical passport survives, but the plane "disintegrated". ![]() Pictures 1 and 3 are the same. Picture 3 is the "passport" that the FBI claimed to have recovered in flight 93 wreckage(or lack thereof). But 1 & 3 look nothing like #2 which is an authentic photo of Jarrah. Complete forgery. U.S investigators also supposedly "intercepted" a letter he sent to his girlfriend in Germany, because he wrote the wrong address on it, even though he had once lived there himself. How could he forget his own address? His uncle, Jamal Jarrah, says the letter is fake too.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |