Home          Evidence       Strategy       FAQ       Report       News       Contact



Pages: (5) 1 [2] 3 4 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

 Face to the Name, images of CIT attackers and detractors
Janusaur
Posted: Feb 3 2009, 11:30 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Friends
Posts: 40
Member No.: 28
Joined: 25-January 08



Jhunter1163 (yellow shirt in front), aka The guy who backed out of his promise to interview any alleged SOC witnesses:

user posted image
Top
Janusaur
Posted: Feb 3 2009, 11:36 AM


Advanced Member


Group: Friends
Posts: 40
Member No.: 28
Joined: 25-January 08



Dtugg, self-professed druggie- obsessed with CIT despite never addressing the evidence:

user posted image

Admits to driving while taking LSD "many times":
user posted image
Top
A.Marquis
Posted: Feb 3 2009, 12:04 PM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 722
Member No.: 2
Joined: 31-August 07



Craig told me the last two posted the pics of themselves. I have to give them credit for at least being man enough to do that.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: Feb 3 2009, 01:40 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2,170
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



Sorry beachy but only pics from the past decade accepted.

I know you don't want to show off your lobotomy scars but those are the rules.
Top
A.Marquis
Posted: Feb 5 2009, 04:15 PM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 722
Member No.: 2
Joined: 31-August 07



Bill "Pinch" Paisley, obsessoid. Angry military goon who simply cannot accept that the plane flew on the north side of the Citgo or any of the other evidence we have uncovered. Shows extreme prejudice and aggression towards 9/11 truthseekers. Needs a traitor's trial.

user posted image

Left his wife standing at the altar. Proof he is Grade A chickenshit.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: Feb 5 2009, 07:23 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2,170
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



Mr. Herbert challenged me on ATS regarding the justification of us having this thread listing their pictures etc and I wanted to post my reply to him here.

He said something idiotic in defense of his anonymity as if threads like this are the reason he stays anonymous when attacking us.

Of course the notion is foolish since he and all the pseudo-skeptics listed in this thread are clearly the unprovoked aggressors.

He ended his post by saying "Do you wonder why most of us stay anonymous?"

To which I replied:

Because you don't want to be accountable for what you say.

We put our names and faces to our claims because we are honest, forthright, honorable, and correct.

We didn't pick a fight with anyone. We're just the messengers so we are attacked.

It's no secret that there is a coordinated group of you who literally spend every day of your adult lives dedicated to assassinating our characters for what amounts to applying true skepticism to a mass murderous event that has been used as justification for permanent global war and countless 100's of billions of dollars in defense/rebuilding contracts.

All we did was go ask the witnesses where the plane flew and honestly report what they told us. There isn't a reason on earth we should be hated or attacked for that.

Don't act like you haven't used my image for ridicule and made MANY attacks on my personal character because you know darn well that you have.

But you're not the only one. Many others have also relentlessly attacked and even lied about me personally, lied about the evidence, while continually dedicating themselves to saying whatever it takes to get people to doubt anything we present.

So yes you better believe we feel that ANY information on these mostly anonymous hostile individuals who aggressively and regularly attack us unprovoked should be revealed. Why wouldn't we? Accountability.

How could we not think of them as our "enemy" with behavior like that?

Whether their motive is ego, confusion, fear, entertainment (as you claim), or greed through a straight up dedication/commitment to the military-industrial-complex these people are not only enemies to us but they are enemies to truth, justice, honor, and this country.

But we won't let them stop us as we will continue to dedicate ourselves to obtaining and reporting independent verifiable evidence.
Top
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Posted: Feb 7 2009, 02:11 PM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 390
Member No.: 3
Joined: 1-September 07



QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Feb 6 2009, 03:23 AM)
To which I replied:

Because you don't want to be accountable for what you say.

We put our names and faces to our claims because we are honest, forthright, honorable, and correct.

We didn't pick a fight with anyone. We're just the messengers so we are attacked.

It's no secret that there is a coordinated group of you who literally spend every day of your adult lives dedicated to assassinating our characters for what amounts to applying true skepticism to a mass murderous event that has been used as justification for permanent global war and countless 100's of billions of dollars in defense/rebuilding contracts.

All we did was go ask the witnesses where the plane flew and honestly report what they told us. There isn't a reason on earth we should be hated or attacked for that.

Don't act like you haven't used my image for ridicule and made MANY attacks on my personal character because you know darn well that you have.

But you're not the only one. Many others have also relentlessly attacked and even lied about me personally, lied about the evidence, while continually dedicating themselves to saying whatever it takes to get people to doubt anything we present.

So yes you better believe we feel that ANY information on these mostly anonymous hostile individuals who aggressively and regularly attack us unprovoked should be revealed. Why wouldn't we? Accountability.

How could we not think of them as our "enemy" with behavior like that?

Whether their motive is ego, confusion, fear, entertainment (as you claim), or greed through a straight up dedication/commitment to the military-industrial-complex these people are not only enemies to us but they are enemies to truth, justice, honor, and this country.

But we won't let them stop us as we will continue to dedicate ourselves to obtaining and reporting independent verifiable evidence.

absolutely right.

these assclowns hide their identities and pose as some sort of authorities on everything 9/11 related. they attack cit on a personal level. they insult cit members for their appearance.

slobert calls me a nazi because i have a shaved head and a goatee. in todays world where men of all colors and religious beliefs have shaved heads and goatees. this is the type of ridicule we have to face.

and then someone sees a picture of all high and mighty slobert and they say wow that asshole has no right to be commenting on anyone's appearance.

look at that fucking slob ass pat curley. wow. i couldn't never sit around in such filth. yet this slobbishly dressed filth pig sits around and ridicules my work in shanksville? he can't even figure out how to straighten up his fucking "work area".......

yeah i can understand why these people want to hide who they really are what they really look like and how they really live.

and you bozos know what? you can hide all that. just shut your fucking mouths and quit attacking other people like theres some sacred law that says it is illegal to out internet trolls who dedicate and obsess attacking real live human beings. there isn't.

the saying goes like this :

dont start no shit wont be no shit.

but your entire lives are dedicated to flinging shit like monkeys in a sewer. you're sad human beings. the whole lot of you "duh-bunkers".
Top
Swing Dangler
  Posted: Feb 9 2009, 07:43 AM


Investigangsta


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 109
Member No.: 21
Joined: 14-January 08



Aldo, I have to be honest....I like your new picture better than any filth on this thread!
tongue.gif
Top
Swing Dangler
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 07:54 AM


Investigangsta


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 109
Member No.: 21
Joined: 14-January 08



Ron Wieck-aka Pomeroo, former host of Hard Fire.user posted image

user posted image
Top
m reed
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 10:00 AM


Investigangsta


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 206
Member No.: 281
Joined: 15-August 08



Edited to add: All visitors from the CIT attack blog called "CIT Watch" please see detailed rebuttal here.

These guys seem like mostly duped goons.

Any photos of the 9/11 Truth infiltrators such as Arabesque, Truth Action, and Blogger moderators?

They shouldn't be to hard to find, considering they're running the 9/11 Truth movement.
Top
A.Marquis
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 10:20 AM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 722
Member No.: 2
Joined: 31-August 07



QUOTE (Domenick DiMaggio CIT @ Feb 7 2009, 10:11 PM)
look at that fucking slob ass pat curley. wow. i couldn't never sit around in such filth. yet this slobbishly dressed filth pig sits around and ridicules my work in shanksville? he can't even figure out how to straighten up his fucking "work area".......

"filth pig" LMAO

Nice post Dom, let that steam blow brother.
Top
A.Marquis
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 10:37 AM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 722
Member No.: 2
Joined: 31-August 07



QUOTE (Swing Dangler @ Feb 9 2009, 03:43 PM)
Aldo, I have to be honest....I like your new picture better than any filth on this thread!
tongue.gif

haha thanks swing.

That is my new girlfriend. That was my little homage to her. I enjoy being able to see her face when I have to post about any of this ugliness. Funny thing is I met her at that LA 9/11 Truth event we did at the Unurban Cafe in Santa Monica. She was not there for the event. She just happened to be there reading her book and sippin on a coffee and I just had to approach her...like 3 times haha. So I did and here we are over a month later, head over heels.
Top
A.Marquis
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 10:52 AM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 722
Member No.: 2
Joined: 31-August 07



QUOTE (m reed @ Feb 9 2009, 06:00 PM)
These guys seem like mostly duped goons.

Any photos of the 9/11 Truth infiltrators such as Arabesque, Truth Action, and Blogger moderators?

They shouldn't be to hard to find, considering they're running the 9/11 Truth movement.

Running it into the ground is more like it.

Nothing on operative Arabesque. It is so obvious that "guy" is an operation in "himself" it is not even funny. I don't know about the bloggersat 911 Blogger. But here is JohnA (aka John Alabanese)...

user posted image

JohnA on FoxNews
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3SbjhdPRa0

JohnA says the most vile, inexcusably wrong shit about our work, check out this thread...
http://www.truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4800

Victronix aka Victoria Ashley
user posted image
She is just a nuisance. Straight up. I sometimes lean towards her being cointel because she is way too obstinate when it comes to the evidence. Regardless, she will NOT contact the witnesses or address our evidence and still refers to it as a "hoax" and continue to encourage everyone to not take us seriously.

Her boyfriend, Jim Hoffman:
user posted image

A lot more silent and less active in the forums. But still refers to our work as a "hoax". We obtained his phone number and called him at one point to challenge him on his accusation. He did not pick up and did not return our call after leaving a message.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 10:59 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 2,170
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



And don't forget Hoffman also refused to respond to our letter that can be read here.
Top
Ligon
Posted: Feb 9 2009, 11:08 AM


Investigangsta


Group: Admin
Posts: 950
Member No.: 144
Joined: 14-July 08



QUOTE (A.Marquis)
Her boyfriend, Jim Hoffman:
user posted image

A lot more silent and less active in the forums. But still refers to our work as a "hoax". We obtained his phone number and called him at one point to challenge him on his accusation. He did not pick up and did not return our call after leaving a message.


For the record (and I've already told Craig and Aldo this) I send Jim Hoffman the following e-mail on 6/15/08. He never responded, nor did he take any of the just and honorable actions that I urged him to take.

QUOTE
Hello,

On your "Hoax Promoting Videos" page I noticed that you list the The PentaCon: Smoking Gun Version by Citizen Investigation Team (CIT).  Instead of writing your own explanation as to why it is a hoax, you simply link a review of the video by someone calling their self Arabesque.  I can't help but wonder whether or not you've actually taken the time to thoroughly and objectively study ALL of the evidence presented by CIT yourself.  It seems to me that it would be clear to anyone who has done so that Arabesque does not come close to adequately proving it to be a "hoax."

Moreover, "The Pentacon: Smoking Gun Version" is now just one video amongst a mounting collection of full-length videos, video shorts and write-ups with additional information.  It represents the first damning evidence supporting their Northside of Citgo / Flyover stance; a case that has only gotten much, much stronger since its release.

I also noticed on the discussion board at ThePentaCon.com that Craig Ranke of CIT has sent you a letter requesting that you either remove CIT's video from your "hoax" page or debate him publicly.  I implore you to do one of these two things for the benefit of those of us who have seen the evidence and do not find Arabesque's "refutation" adequate.

If you have truly taken the time to thoroughly and objectively study ALL of the evidence presented by CIT yourself and continue to find it to be disinfo or a hoax, please enlighten those of us who have also done so and have not come to the same conclusion, publicly and in your own words.

If you have not taken the time to thoroughly and objectively study ALL of the evidence presented by CIT yourself please, in the name of fairness, stop trying to marginalize their work.

- (Name Redacted)

P.S. I have never met any members of CIT.  I am not a member of their discussion forum.  My only communication with them was an e-mail I sent to them a while back thanking them for their work.  I am just a person who has researched 9/11 extensively on my own.


The post script was true at the time, by the way.
Top
« Next Oldest | CIT response | Next Newest »

Topic OptionsPages: (5) 1 [2] 3 4 ... Last »



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1196 seconds | Archive