Flight 93 landed at 10:28AM EST

according to this :

http://www.orbitfiles.com/download/id3314169481.html

This file provided to Brian Stark via FOIA 2008-3195. It is an Excel sheet recording the DCA departures/arrivals for 9/11/2001
http://aal77.com/faa/FOIA%202008-3195%20(Stark).xls

DCA is Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
http://www.airportcodes.us/us-airports.htm

Thanks Domenick, I was following this one on p4t.
Truly bizarre.
Add to this Todd Beamer's cell phone calls that were coming out until 20:58 that day,
and everything makes perfect sense…that and red bandanas of course.

yeah not crashing and dying would explain how todd was able to continue making calls to new jersey to try and tip someone off that he wasn't dead yet.......

Dom, could you elaborate about Beamer

http://intelfiles.egoplex.com/2001-09-29-F...one-records.pdf

todd beamer's cell on 9/11 tried calling a residence in new jersey until 20:58 each call lasting about a minute in length.

Very interesting. Is there any way I can verify the authenticity of the FBI Todd Beamer document and the excel file provided to Brian Stark?

Hi Dom - Jus been looking at the document provided by Brian stark containing arrivals n departures on 9/11. Very interested indeed ! - Especially as the phonecalls from Tod Beamer seem to check out with it. I do however have one piece of confusion that I'm hoping you can help me with. According to my notes, 'national groundstop' was put into operation at 9.26am on 9/11 if I'm not mistaken. Therefore how can there still be many arrivals at Reagan as shown on the document provided by Stark after 9.26am and right through to 10.30am including Flight 93? I'm just concerned as to the validation of the document. Shed any light Dom??

From Loose Change forums

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums...143314&t=700788

So, is this landing data of flight plan data?

How can it be a flight plan if UAL93 was destined to land in San Francisco international airport?

I'm quoting him again, same post

This is what I found on 9/11 timeline
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?...30newflightplan

Why the hell would a hijacker request a new flight plan?

i dont believe there are other sources for these documentations so the best thing to be for confirmation would be requesting copies from the sources for your own records.

i'm going to say the reason there are so many arrivals after the national groundstop is because those planes were already airborne when it was issued. dca may have been the destination for some while others were diverted here most likely.

So, is this landing data of flight plan data?

i don't believe it to be.

i'm trying to get a better understanding of it now as both sides are making argument over this point. i can't see how even if flight 93 changed its flight path that would put it in the arrivals for the dca. i still think it would have to actually land there before it gets logged. i don't think those who document all these intricate details day to day come to work and log everything in before lunch. know what i'm sayin? lol

This is what I found on 9/11 timeline
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?...30newflightplan

Why the hell would a hijacker request a new flight plan?

there seems to be a lot wrong with this.....

so while planes are being hijacked by arabs who have some "planes" as they announced to the world, an arab makes a highly unusual or uncommon or both for that matter, request for a flight path change to the nation's capitol and be granted........

this has to send like a hundred red flags up to those who receive that request especially with all the other surrounding circumstances.........

so now the questions become if there any audio log of this?
who sent the requst?
who was the recipient?
what was the standard operating methods in place and were they followed?
if so who approved it?
if not why?

ughhhhhhhhh.

Exactly !