Home          Evidence       Strategy       FAQ       Report       News       Contact

InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Register Now


Pages: (2) 1 [2]  ( Go to first unread post )

 Flight 93 landed at 10:28AM EST
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Posted: Oct 25 2008, 10:41 AM


Citizen Investigator


Group: Admin
Posts: 532
Member No.: 3
Joined: 1-September 07



According to the 9/11 Commission, less than a minute after Flight 93 acknowledged a routine radio transmission from the FAA’s Cleveland Center (see 9:27 a.m. September 11, 2001), John Werth—the controller handling the flight—and pilots of other aircraft in the vicinity of Flight 93 hear “a radio transmission of unintelligible sounds of possible screaming or a struggle from an unknown origin.” [Federal Aviation Administration, 9/11/2001; 9/11 Commission, 6/17/2004; CBS News, 9/10/2006] Someone, presumably Flight 93’s pilot Jason Dahl, is overheard by controllers as he shouts, “Mayday!” [New York Times, 7/22/2004] Seconds later, the controller responds, “Somebody call Cleveland?” Then there are more sounds of screaming and someone yelling, “Get out of here, get out of here.” [Toronto Sun, 9/16/2001; Newsweek, 9/22/2001; Observer, 12/2/2001; MSNBC, 7/30/2002; 9/11 Commission, 6/17/2004] Then the voices of the hijackers can be heard talking in Arabic. The words are later translated to show they are talking to each other, saying, “Everything is fine.” [Newsweek, 12/3/2001]

Shortly before Flight 93 reverses direction and heads east, someone in its cockpit radios in and asks the FAA for a new flight plan, with a final destination of Washington, DC. [ABC News, 9/11/2001; ABC News, 9/14/2001] Jeff Krawczyk, the chief operating officer of a company that tracks aircraft movements, later comments, “We hardly ever get a flight plan change. Very unusual.” [Washington Business Journal, 9/11/2001] Who it is that makes this request is unclear. The hijacker takeover of Flight 93 occurred around 9:28 a.m. (see (9:28 a.m.) September 11, 2001) [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 11] , so it is presumably made by one of the hijackers. Twenty-five minutes later the pilot hijacker will also program a new destination into the plane’s navigational system (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001).

so this shows up as an arrival at dca because al qaeda [after being heard hijacking a plane on a day when 2 other hijacked planes have already been slammed into the wtc] contacted faa and made a highly unusual request for a flight path change to help them reach their target which is approved?

someone is assisting 'al qaeda' from within......or flight 93 really did land at reagan.
now they have to make a choice.
Top
skeptic
Posted: Oct 25 2008, 01:28 PM


Curious Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 32
Member No.: 340
Joined: 25-August 08



QUOTE (Domenick DiMaggio CIT @ Oct 25 2008, 09:41 PM)
Twenty-five minutes later the pilot hijacker will also program a new destination into the plane’s navigational system (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001).
someone is assisting 'al qaeda' from within......or flight 93 really did land at reagan.
now they have to make a choice.

I wonder what they mean by "plane's navigational system"
If by "navigational system" they refer to the FMS (flight management system), than it is important to know that operating such equipment requires knowledge and experience far beyond what you would expect from private licensed pilots, or by any pilot that has never flown "heavy" or sophisticated type jets.
There are of course easier systems to use, such as VOR or ADF, but I wonder why bother with all of this, if after all the hijacker's soul intention is crashing the plane.

Maybe they just needed to buy time to steam iron their bandanas, so they will be in good condition for the trial exhibitions.
blink.gif
Top
JonJon
Posted: Oct 1 2010, 11:40 AM


Concerned Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 68
Member No.: 1,185
Joined: 28-September 10



QUOTE (Domenick DiMaggio CIT @ Oct 6 2008, 05:14 PM)
QUOTE (TrueOrFalse @ Oct 6 2008, 09:34 PM)
I'm quoting him again, same post
QUOTE ("streetcar304")
Re-read up on what the ATC system controllers did regarding UA 93's in-flight plan and how they changed it to DCA from its original destination of SFO, resulting in the data on the spreadsheet showing DCA as its destination with a projected landing time.'
QUOTE
9:30 a.m. September 11, 2001: Flight 93 Requests a New Flight Plan

Shortly before Flight 93 reverses direction and heads east, someone in its cockpit radios in and asks the FAA for a new flight plan, with a final destination of Washington, DC. eff Krawczyk, the chief operating officer of a company that tracks aircraft movements, later comments, “We hardly ever get a flight plan change. Very unusual.” Who it is that makes this request is unclear. The hijacker takeover of Flight 93 occurred around 9:28 a.m., so it is presumably made by one of the hijackers. Twenty-five minutes later the pilot hijacker will also program a new destination into the plane’s navigational system (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001).


Why the hell would a hijacker request a new flight plan?

QUOTE (skeptic)
How can it be a flight plan if UAL93 was destined to land in San Francisco international airport?


there seems to be a lot wrong with this.....

so while planes are being hijacked by arabs who have some "planes" as they announced to the world, an arab makes a highly unusual or uncommon or both for that matter, request for a flight path change to the nation's capitol and be granted........

this has to send like a hundred red flags up to those who receive that request especially with all the other surrounding circumstances.........

so now the questions become if there any audio log of this?
who sent the requst?
who was the recipient?
what was the standard operating methods in place and were they followed?
if so who approved it?
if not why?

ughhhhhhhhh.

angry.gif


my friend who wishes to not hear any of what I have to say...says the pre-programmed flight data, the one used for most coast to coast flights can be easily changed...is he right??

~~~Twenty-five minutes later the pilot hijacker will also program a new destination into the plane’s navigational system (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001).~~~

At this point, common sense would tell NORAD to follow this plane, and then shoot it down after its first warning...one bldg has already been 'allegedly' struck--unless of course, NORAD is advised of the farce.
Top
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Posted: Oct 3 2010, 09:56 AM


Citizen Investigator


Group: Admin
Posts: 532
Member No.: 3
Joined: 1-September 07



QUOTE (JonJon @ Oct 1 2010, 07:40 PM)
my friend who wishes to not hear any of what I have to say...says the pre-programmed flight data, the one used for most coast to coast flights can be easily changed...is he right??


QUOTE
Shortly before Flight 93 reverses direction and heads east, someone in its cockpit radios in and asks the FAA for a new flight plan, with a final destination of Washington, DC. [ABC News, 9/11/2001; ABC News, 9/14/2001] Jeff Krawczyk, the chief operating officer of a company that tracks aircraft movements, later comments, “We hardly ever get a flight plan change. Very unusual.”


it has to go through the faa.
Top
JonJon
Posted: Oct 3 2010, 05:02 PM


Concerned Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 68
Member No.: 1,185
Joined: 28-September 10



THANKS.

And wasn't this after 2 alleged planes had attacked??
Duh!

Shortly before Flight 93 reverses direction and heads east, someone in its cockpit radios in and asks the FAA for a new flight plan, with a final destination of Washington, DC.


Why, sure...need some help there old chap?
How about if I clear the entire sky for you to make it easier to get to the White HOuse??
Top
T3QuillAMocKINGbird
Posted: Oct 13 2010, 01:58 AM


Curious Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 24
Member No.: 1,143
Joined: 6-February 10



Whoa... What time did the Transponders go off, if the transponder is off and they request and are granted there is even more to question.

Very interesting! Someone should look at other planes that landed and how their flightplans were changed that day as the skys were cleared. This would prove that the other planes following their flightplans that landed at DCA would be noted as changed in the same manner that 93 was or if they are not and contain the original flightplans then it would be obvious to make a solid conclusion.
Top
rSpieker
Posted: Oct 13 2010, 12:38 PM


Concerned Citizen


Group: Friends
Posts: 63
Member No.: 986
Joined: 25-January 09



QUOTE (T3QuillAMocKINGbird @ Oct 13 2010, 11:58 AM)

Very interesting! Someone should look at other planes that landed and how their flightplans were changed that day as the skys were cleared.

This Someone should be you!

Do your homework!!
Top
T3QuillAMocKINGbird
Posted: Oct 14 2010, 02:06 AM


Curious Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 24
Member No.: 1,143
Joined: 6-February 10



I am not a Shanksville expert, and I am just brainstorming so forgive me if I don't contribute. I figured someone has the lists already which I don't have, but if you would like me to stop posting when I don't have info then I will refrain.
Top
Winkhorst
Posted: Oct 17 2011, 07:29 AM


Concerned Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 71
Member No.: 1,154
Joined: 23-March 10



QUOTE (JonJon @ Oct 3 2010, 05:02 PM)
THANKS.

And wasn't this after 2 alleged planes had attacked??
Duh!

Shortly before Flight 93 reverses direction and heads east, someone in its cockpit radios in and asks the FAA for a new flight plan, with a final destination of Washington, DC.


Why, sure...need some help there old chap?
How about if I clear the entire sky for you to make it easier to get to the White House??

What bothers me is that these supposed hijackers allowed the planes to fly hundreds of miles out and only then hijacked them and turned them around and headed for their supposd targets. In the normal course of events, this would give the authorities ample time to send up jets and to intercept them and then shoot them down if they didn't cooperate. Only under these circumstances would it be necessary to change the flight plan to avoid being shot down. And would not the authorities request an answer to the nagging question, "Why, exactly, do you want to change your flight plan when you are scheduled to fly to San Francisco?" I ask you this: Are these the actions of real-world hijackers who actually intend to accomplish something before dying and who DO NOT have reason to believe they are being aided and abetted from the inside?

If *I* were planning such an attack, I would pick a flight heading in the general direction of the target and then hijack the plane when it was nearing the target. Anything else would be idiotic and highly suspicious.
Top
Harry_B
Posted: Dec 7 2011, 09:21 PM


Concerned Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 60
Member No.: 1,177
Joined: 19-August 10



QUOTE
my friend who wishes to not hear any of what I have to say...says the pre-programmed flight data, the one used for most coast to coast flights can be easily changed...is he right??
Can he completely explain how he would accomplish this?
- If not, why not?
- If yes, where did he learn it?
Maybe he can give us a link to download the instruction manual? biggrin.gif
Top
onesliceshort
Posted: Dec 8 2011, 05:39 AM


Citizen Investigator


Group: Friends
Posts: 954
Member No.: 1,023
Joined: 29-April 09



QUOTE (Harry_B @ Dec 7 2011, 09:21 PM)
QUOTE
my friend who wishes to not hear any of what I have to say...says the pre-programmed flight data, the one used for most coast to coast flights can be easily changed...is he right??
Can he completely explain how he would accomplish this?
- If not, why not?
- If yes, where did he learn it?
Maybe he can give us a link to download the instruction manual? biggrin.gif

I remember reading (a while back) at Pilotsfor911Truth of how the binary numbers recorded can be electronically changed - been searching for the link and can't find it sad.gif

My own personal take on it is based on Warren Stutt's alleged decode of the bs FDR data of "Flight 77".

The guy used a publically available program (Excel?) and manually added numbers in the appropriate fields (even though he twisted the numbers and omitted others, it still added up to bs). The very fact that he could manually make a program shows that the "FDR data" was very open to manipulation.

The "data" was shown to have been downloaded or "got at" 4 hours before the official time it was allegedly found.

What was released was basically a series of numbers from an alleged FDR that had not only no serial number but was void of a digital identification contained within the unit itself.

And they couldn't even get their story straight on who found it and where!

Oh, and don't forget the "missing seconds" within the most controversial stage of the flightpath. dry.gif

Top
« Next Oldest | Shanksville | Next Newest »
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic OptionsPages: (2) 1 [2] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1193 seconds | Archive