| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: Dec 1 2007, 01:00 PM
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 3,930 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
This important short reveals many important details about the suspect witnesses who were allegedly on route 27 right in front of the Pentagon at the time of the attack.
The USA Today Pardade featuring (Mike Walter and Joel Sucherman) ![]() |
| Harry_B |
Posted: Dec 13 2011, 09:13 AM
|
||
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 60 Member No.: 1,177 Joined: 19-August 10 |
Hi Craig,
Concerning those describing that the plane crossed their windshields, and whose location was known precisely enough - would it be very complicated to reconstruct their view of the flight path through their windshields in a 3D software? This could make clear that some of them are actually NoC witnesses. You might object that the reports of fake witnesses are not helpful, but even if they reported only what they were told to, maybe they did not know that they should have lied about the final flight path to the Pentagon. I am slowly bud steadily populating a Wiki database about the Pentagon witnesses, and the first attribute I am tagging is whether someone directly or indirectly reported a NoC path, independently of what else he reported. (As long as it is not proven that he had no view.) Harry |
||
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: Dec 13 2011, 10:10 AM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 3,930 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Complicated enough that I sure couldn't do it. Besides, animation software can never be as accurate as the real thing. If you haven't watched it lately the video linked in this thread was updated this year to be more accurate and include footage of their alleged POV taken from 9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4PcqTrw3V4 |
||
| stevendabudgie |
Posted: Dec 14 2011, 08:20 AM
|
|
Curious Citizen Group: Member Posts: 23 Member No.: 1,192 Joined: 2-November 10 |
What is also interesting is the fact that a false alarm went off shortly before the Pentagon explosion which resulted in medical and firefighter units already on the way near the Pentagon. Another coincidence?
Even more interesting is the fact that ther DoD occupied rooms in the USA Today Building. http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2008/10/...g-fire-and.html |
| Harry_B |
Posted: Dec 14 2011, 09:53 AM
|
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 60 Member No.: 1,177 Joined: 19-August 10 |
Ok, Joel Sucherman is clearly enough a NoC witness. Before you did your interviews at the CITGO, NoC and SoC were no notions yet, so maybe they forgot to tell him about this detail
. To the others I will get later. |
| 22205 |
Posted: Dec 14 2011, 11:26 AM
|
||
|
Rise Against Group: Admin Posts: 764 Member No.: 225 Joined: 1-August 08 |
i believe the intention of that false alarm was to SLOW DOWN the response to the pentagon, not speed it up. have a look here for some details: http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/806333/1/ |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |