Larson's claims of "massive perspective error", on part of the witnesses

Larson attempted a little attack on one of the witnesses we will be presenting in the Researcher's Edition who corroborates Jamal's account.

He concluded that Jamal (and subsequently the new witness) would have to be "tainted with massive perspective error" in order to place the plane where they did.

Of course he is completely wrong as usual.

They would have to have been 200 feet tall or had magical vision to see the plane AT ALL on the official flight path.

You can see their POV's in the video/images and it's 100% clear due to the extremely tall trees in the landscape and level topography that they would not see a plane near tree top level a couple long blocks or 1,600 feet away at all.

His conclusion is rather telling though because when considering the potential flight paths that are actually possible with ALL of the witness testimony we present he seems to not be willing to accept any reasonable amount perspective error at all and insists on accepting their literal interpretation as the only possibility.

But when it comes to comparing their accounts to the official flight path he is willing to accept "massive perspective error" on the account of ALL the witnesses (even if it's impossible for them to have seen the official flight path at all) but for some reason quickly rejects the notion that reasonable perspective error may have come into play.


We saw him do this with "the ladies of 13th and Poe", the NoC witnesses, and now of course Jamal and this new witness who corroborates him.
Intellectual dishonesty at its finest.

After this latest admission of his it will be hard for him to keep up his pseudo-objectivity as he continuously writes off ALL the witnesses to having "massive perspective issues" since they all so thoroughly destroy his official conspiracy fantasy that he works day and night to protect for the government.

Thanks for giving us some room to play with our potential flight paths!


p.s. the witness is NOT pointing out the direction the plane was heading in that image. He was pointing to it's location which is just above those trees headed straight for the driving range. He corroborates Jamal perfectly and therefore further proves the NTSB data fraudulent.

The only "massive perspective error" being posed by Larson is the fact he continues to compare a perspective view to an orthogonal view.


Funny shit on the gifs by the way. What a freakin tool this guy is. Cant believe i even gave him the time of day...

Looks like he also needs a janitor at his house.


I wonder if that "Nick" kid was the same "Nick" we were arguing with last year on ATS. Just goes to show, you never know when you are arguing with a 10 yr old, or a complete tool, on the net (although, i think we pretty much figured that out by now)

Looks like the above hit a nerve with Adam...lol

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread304540/pg3


Now he is threatening to "punch me in the face" if i were in the same room as him.

I say.. .Bring it on pipsqueak! Give me just one excuse.




Your brain is as thin as your arms Adam. You'd think hauling trash as you do day in and day out you'd grow something on those bones.


Internet Tough Guys.. too funny.


ETA: Adam.. YOU brought the kid into this by having him post on the net (if in fact it was the same Nick. Going by his replies, it sure seemed like a 10 yr old). Not to mention the fact you can scroll through "related videos" on the right margin of your "CausticLogic" videos and find "AdamSonOfLars" and vice versa.

Adam, im not surprised you arent very observant to such exposure YOU have caused. By the way, stop being so paranoid. Our "fans" have alot more to lose than you and wont ever give you the time of day. Many are suprised i even bother.

He's such a hypocritical tool.

He obsesses over our research AND us personally.

ANYTHING that greasy haired fool puts on the net is fair game.

He is bankrupt on trying to counter the overwhelming evidence we have proving his precious 757 impact story false so he is resorting to quote mining in a sad effort to focus on you personally and interpret your motives.

Yeah the NoC witnesses and the NTSB animation came out around the same time.

No it was not YOUR job to explain exactly WHY the NTSB released that animation the way they did.

Yes CIT refused to embrace the NTSB animation as corroboration simply because it's fraudulent government provided data and we knew tools like Larson would one day use it against us.

The fact is that ALL of us are learning as we do more research and obtain more evidence.

That does not change the FACT that the hard evidence from the street PROVES the plane did not hit the building.

All Larson is doing is making a sad desperate last attempt to deflect attention away from this while casting doubt on the messenger.

Notice how he has avoided our latest presentation like the plague.

He is so predictable and so ineffective because NONE of his convoluted nonsense remotely begins to counter the incredible amount of independent confirmed corroborated proof we have of the NoC, EoP, and ONA (over navy annex) claims.

He is much better at clay animation than defending the government's crimes of mass murder.

Larson:

Too much.


I'll go ahead and referrence it every time he comes up so his supposed "gauge" will be rendered pointless.


Sooooo....

For those that haven't heard yet:

Adam Larson has admitted that he has an ego driven obsession with us.

Isn't that one of the most pathetic things you have ever heard?

A healthy functional human would prefer to spend more time with their family than choose to be voluntarily "obsessed" with people he thinks are nut cases or plain old wrong.

Apparently to Adam Larson ego is more important.

Disgusting.

Poor Nick.

Adam has some serious issues and perhaps should seek professional help for his obsessive compulsive disorder.

He also thinks i "agree" with him. Not only does he have a problem with obsession, but he is clearly delusional.

If it werent for us, he wouldnt have any reason to "blog" and therefore perhaps even less of a life. I say we do what everyone else does... ignore him. The boy clearly has issues.

Got bored tonight so i decided to check out some of Adams' blogs for comic relief. Posted this in his comments section, but he probably wont approve it, so im copying it here which he has linked.