| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: Jun 6 2010, 08:55 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 3,930 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
It's true that there are no witnesses who report seeing a light pole spear the cab and the cab spin out on the road with a 35 ft light pole still in it. It's also true that the witnesses prove the plane was nowhere near the light pole. |
||
| Ligon |
Posted: Jun 6 2010, 08:59 PM
|
|
A Regular Jim Garrison Group: Admin Posts: 2,218 Member No.: 144 Joined: 14-July 08 |
Nor did anyone see Lloyde and the alleged silent stranger (who he originally said was his "friend") removing the pole as Lloyde claims.
Nor are there any pictures of the pole in Lloyde's cab or being removed from Lloyde's cab even though there were pictures taken shortly after the explosion. |
| Winkhorst |
Posted: Jun 7 2010, 04:05 PM
|
||
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 1,154 Joined: 23-March 10 |
Ligon said:
Lloyde originally said the other guy was his friend? Was he suggesting the other guy was in his cab at the time? Or was he saying his friend just happened to be there? That would be almost as coincidental as Lloyde's cab getting stuck with the light pole in the first place. I guess what annoys me the most is, it's so blatant. And yet the official media acts like it's perfectly reasonable. It never occurs to them to even question the rationality of it. And yes, Craig, I realize the witnesses don't place the plane anywhere near where it could have done what it's supposed to have done. It's enough to make me grind my teeth. |
||
| Ligon |
Posted: Jun 10 2010, 08:32 AM
|
||||
|
A Regular Jim Garrison Group: Admin Posts: 2,218 Member No.: 144 Joined: 14-July 08 |
I created a new thread to answer your questions in detail: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=1277 |
||||
| Winkhorst |
Posted: Jun 10 2010, 04:57 PM
|
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 1,154 Joined: 23-March 10 |
Thanks.
I'll reply to you there. |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: Jun 13 2010, 07:27 AM
|
||||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 3,930 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Yes. He didn't marry her until after 9/11. He expressed to me that he misses his late wife and basically said that he married Shirley because she didn't drink or smoke so he had no reason not to! |
||||
| onesliceshort |
Posted: Jun 13 2010, 07:55 AM
|
||||
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Friends Posts: 951 Member No.: 1,023 Joined: 29-April 09 |
Good Moorish reasoning there (knowing a few from the area I'm living in) |
||||
| onesliceshort |
Posted: Jun 13 2010, 08:14 AM
|
||
|
Citizen Investigator Group: Friends Posts: 951 Member No.: 1,023 Joined: 29-April 09 |
I actually met this woman. Her story is crazy man. A member of the Spanish Royal family who was a lesbian (married and left all her money and land to her wife) and a socialist! She had a crazy amount of controversial documents dating back to the time when Spain was owned by the Moors. She claimed to have documents that made the whole history of Spain a falsehood and that the Royal family of Spain is directly descended from Moor blood. The Spanish Inquisition was used to eliminate all traces of this ancestry or anybody who new of the links. Thing is, the present King, Juan Carlos is said to be the honorary head of the Knights of Malta (if my memory serves me correct - I'm rusty on the Masons) He is a regular feature of the Bilderberg group. The Moors have had an extensive influence/bloodline on the present day royal families of Europe and I guess that would extend to the US as well. Sorry for dumping all of this unsourced info. Just going by memory. The Moor connection isn't as trivial as first appears. |
||
| Winkhorst |
Posted: Jun 13 2010, 08:20 AM
|
||||||
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 1,154 Joined: 23-March 10 |
Indeed. From what I have read (I'm no expert), there is a major emphasis on being a good citizen, an emphasis that has existed from the beginning. Then again, Lloyde may have been exhibiting a rather dry sense of humor. It seems to me some folks don't give him due credit for being an intelligent human being capable of crafting his responses to the situation. |
||||||
| Winkhorst |
Posted: Jun 13 2010, 08:54 AM
|
||||
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 1,154 Joined: 23-March 10 |
I, for one, do not take the Moorish connection to be trivial. And yes, the Inquisition was a turning point in world history, or rather the telling of world history. My own family goes back to pre-inquisition Spain and Portugal, from which they fled to Eastern Europe. Much that was known during Moorish rule was obliterated from the record after they were driven out. As for Moors in America, I have no trouble taking that seriously either. There is actually fairly strong evidence that America was known and mined from at least the time of Sargon the Great (24rd Century BC) and perhaps as early as the beginning of the Bronze Age. By some estimates, half a BILLION pounds of copper were taken out of northern Michigan from circa 3000 to circa 1200 BC, before iron became the metal of choice sometime around the time of the Trojan War. That being said, some of the doctrines of the Moorish Science Temple are clearly wishful thinking. And whether the actions of Lloyde England on 9/11 had anything to do with his affiliation with the MST remains an open question. It should also be kept in mind that there are splinter groups of the MST that also use the -el and -bey suffixes to their names. In particular, the so-called 5-Percenters, whose perspective is not all that different from that of David Icke, that is, most people are sheep being led around by the nose. I would not expect a member of the MST to be reading Icke, whether Lloyde claimed not to know what Icke was about or not. I would, however, expect someone involved with the splinter groups to be interested in Icke. |
||||
| Winkhorst |
Posted: Mar 6 2011, 05:17 PM
|
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 1,154 Joined: 23-March 10 |
Craig,
Just reading your attempt at a discussion of Lloyde's taxi at the Randi forum. Those guys are jackals with no interest in anything but demonstrating their own ignorance and stupidity. Apparently being a "skeptic" entails not believing anything that isn't sanctioned by the U.S. government. |
| 22205 |
Posted: Dec 26 2011, 10:46 AM
|
||||||||||
|
Rise Against Group: Admin Posts: 764 Member No.: 225 Joined: 1-August 08 |
during some recent research, i ran into another moorish temple member, and wanted to add it here- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Rodney_Hampton-El
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?e...dney_hampton-el ![]() http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/1999/jan/17/yemen.islam
|
||||||||||
| Winkhorst |
Posted: Nov 12 2012, 12:46 PM
|
|
Concerned Citizen Group: Member Posts: 71 Member No.: 1,154 Joined: 23-March 10 |
The case of Clement Rodney Hampton is interesting in that it expresses a certain dissonance with the original reason for establishing the Moorish Science Temple. The Temple was established, as far as I can tell, in order to create a kind of national identity myth for African-Americans in which their presence in America did not result from slavery, but from a much nobler history of exploration and conquest. In this regard, the Moslem aspect of the religion is quite superficial, their "Moorish" nationality being of much more importance.
I should also reiterate that there are splinter groups of the original organization. Do we know for a fact that Hampton belonged to the "mother church," so to speak, and not to a splinter group? Again, one of Drew's original main tenets was good citizenship. I can much more easily see Lloyde England expressing this kind of good citizenship, no matter how twisted, working with the military on 9/11 than Clement Hampton expressing its opposite by trying to blow up the World Trade Center. |
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |