| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Domenick DiMaggio CIT |
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 06:30 PM
|
|
Investigangsta Group: Admin Posts: 365 Member No.: 3 Joined: 1-September 07 |
From the above evidence, it is clear that an event which generated a high frequency surface wave which preceded the main truck bomb blast by 4.2 seconds. This event was recorded at two different locations at distances of 100 yards and 1/3 of a mile. Because the 4.2 second interval remains constant at both distances, theories of mechanism producing echoes are eliminated. Because the spectrogram of the lawyer's tape shows BOTH surface and airborne waves separated by 4.2 seconds from BOTH surface and airborne waves of the truck bomb, arguments of a surface/air phenomenon are invalid. Two events at the Murrah building 4.2 seconds apart produced two sets of surface/air pairs 4.2 seconds apart at the lawyer's office.
These images are scans of the seismographic output from the Norman Oklahoma Z-axis recorder for April 19th and May 23rd; the bombing and the demolition respectively. This is the raw data which led Ray Brown and Charles Mankin to decide that there may have been a second explosion. It turns out that the 10 second delay is caused by differing propagation times through the layers of shale and sandstone that lie under Oklahoma City. April 19th: The Bombing of the Murrah Building ![]() ![]() ![]() May 23rd: The Sequenced Demolition of the Murrah Building The additional spikes on this record are caused by wind flexing the radio antenna which is used to transmit the data to the Oklahoma Geological Survey. Seismographic record of the Murrah Building Demolition ![]() ![]() Note that the 8 second long sequenced demolition of the remainder of the Murrah Building yielded a trace the same length as the original bombing. The first trace, if indeed a single explosion, should be shorter. But it isn't, suggesting that BOTH events consisted of multiple sequenced detonations over several seconds' duration. |
| Swing Dangler |
Posted: May 28 2008, 05:25 AM
|
|
Investigangsta Group: "Team" Member Posts: 104 Member No.: 21 Joined: 14-January 08 |
Hello gentlemen. I would like to add the following video (off line) to help debunk the official OCK bombing.
In the program Conspiracy Test: OKC, the two rival theories (FBI v. General Partin) are tested. The hosts build a truck bomb to Timothy McVeigh's alleged arrangement, and then test its effect on a concrete column like the one closest to McVeigh's Oklahoma City truck bomb. The distance from truck to bomb is identical to the theories of the Federal building bombing. Problem 1. Equipment Malfunction The first test "disrupted the equipment" that was suppose to measure the force. Shucks, no reading. The cement column was peppered with fragments and moved a bit in place but was not destroyed, blown apart, or blown over! The results apparently didn't match what they were looking for in the first place: confirmation of the government story. As I was watching I couldn't believe there was a "malfunction" with the equipment that was measure the force while the camera showed a column with little impact from the blast, and suprisingly had no problem recording the event. Of course, the official theory has the bomb destroying numerous columns nearest the truck and deep into the building. The science shows that the truck bomb could not destroy even one column. Unbelievable...well not really. Problem 2. The second test. The second test has the truck bomb in an open truck bed different from the first test and arranged in a different manner but still close to the column. Apparently the testers and producers felt TM lied about the arrangement of the ANFO in the truck. The bomb is detonated and the equipment survives this blast. The pressures measures supposedly disproves General Partin. The actual force measured was 5,500 lbs - consistent with the FBI'spredictions, but not General Partin who was skeptical of the official story. And yet again a column is peppered with shrapnel and moved in its place but is not destroyed!! No one associated with the test did not even mention this fact in the video. By this time, I knew the fix was in. I rewound the DVR and made some comments to my wife. I watched the replay of the first test and there were lots of footage of the column, the hole in the ground, the surrounding destruction, etc. I watched the second test again and the column's picture was flashed briefly only a couple of times within the footage. The exposure of that piece of evidence was very limited the second time around while those conducting the tests were giddy with the numbers that were produced by equipment that didn't malfunction. I figured by then the producers knew that was the smoking gun and not the 5500 lbs of force that was supposedly measured. Two ANFO tests with the same result: a barely leaning column peppered with debris but not destroyed and yet not mentioned once by anyone in the documentary. I haven't been able to find the video posted online, but it is a remarkable piece of evidence. The foolish producers unknowingly proved a conspiracy with their tests. |
| Ayla |
Posted: Sep 28 2008, 08:27 AM
|
|
Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 13 Member No.: 610 Joined: 27-September 08 |
Interesting finds in this thread Domenick and Swing Dangler!
Nice work. The OKC bombing is, sadly, and example of the governments plan, IMO. Most people could care less about the OKC bombing by now, so they just deny deny deny until enough time has passed. This must not happen with 911 - And this site is a great help in keeping the discrepancies fresh in the minds of people. Even though it needs to somehow reach mainstream media, so the pressure on the government get's too big to avoid. I hope some "major" reporters will open their eyes before it's too late, like they did with Watergate etc. If you have any links for some OKC "conspiracy" videos, please post them here. The only one I have seen is the 2 hour VHS quality one from google video. There's some good points in that one. The crater not being visible AT ALL on aerial photos right after the blast, for example. ![]() Regards Martin |
| Ayla |
Posted: Sep 28 2008, 08:36 AM
|
|
Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 13 Member No.: 610 Joined: 27-September 08 |
It's also interesting to see Michael Chertoff's name come up so much in regards to the 1993 WTC bombing, the OKC bombing and as we all know 9-11 (and the side note of Popular Mechanics family ties).
Here for example: http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/04-10-05/...ion.cgi.66.html /Martin |
| JustAdream |
Posted: Mar 9 2009, 04:11 AM
|
||
|
Investigangsta Group: Banned Posts: 64 Member No.: 1,016 Joined: 7-March 09 |
The OKC bombing in 95' was planned in Elohim city...(Elohim is hebrew for gods)..it is a base of operations for Mossad |
||
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |