Home          Evidence       Strategy       FAQ       Report       News       Contact

InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Sign-up for Free


Pages: (2) 1 [2]  ( Go to first unread post )

 A little more on Adam Larson, please
sweetpea
Posted: Mar 26 2008, 07:00 PM


Curious Citizen


Group: Member
Posts: 32
Member No.: 48
Joined: 1-March 08



So you don't have the evidence, which means you *can't* "take this to court right now and win."

Why did you say you could? It certainly doesn't speak well of this website and smacks of hyperbole to the max. If you exaggerate about that, what else are you people exaggerating about? I wasn't impressed with your "evidence" to start out with, now you are telling me you don't "have" any evidence to "take this to court right now and win." even though you said you could.

"You" need subpoena powers? Are you a prosecutor? I wasn't aware that a private citizen can get "subpoena" powers.

But, I suppose in the bottom line, if you "don't have the evidence", it would be sorta hard to convince a prosecutor to go to a district court and ask for subpoena powers based on a "You'll have to trust me on this - I don't have the evidence, but I *know* what went down" argument.

Still, I'm sure this is an entertaining little intellectual exercise you guys have going on here even if it doesn't amount to anything. There are great leaps of imagination and logic, but that is what intellectual exercises are for, no?

Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: Mar 26 2008, 07:32 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 3,930
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



Dom is talking about his efforts regarding the event in Shanksville.

We have proven a military deception in Arlington many times over and you haven't even come close to refuting a single bit of it or even addressing a fraction of it.
Top
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Posted: Mar 27 2008, 05:13 AM


Citizen Investigator


Group: Admin
Posts: 532
Member No.: 3
Joined: 1-September 07



QUOTE (sweetpea @ Mar 27 2008, 03:00 AM)
So you don't have the evidence, which means you *can't* "take this to court right now and win."

Why did you say you could? It certainly doesn't speak well of this website and smacks of hyperbole to the max. If you exaggerate about that, what else are you people exaggerating about? I wasn't impressed with your "evidence" to start out with, now you are telling me you don't "have" any evidence to "take this to court right now and win." even though you said you could.

"You" need subpoena powers? Are you a prosecutor? I wasn't aware that a private citizen can get "subpoena" powers.

But, I suppose in the bottom line, if you "don't have the evidence", it would be sorta hard to convince a prosecutor to go to a district court and ask for subpoena powers based on a "You'll have to trust me on this - I don't have the evidence, but I *know* what went down" argument.

Still, I'm sure this is an entertaining little intellectual exercise you guys have going on here even if it doesn't amount to anything. There are great leaps of imagination and logic, but that is what intellectual exercises are for, no?

Yes you are correct in that I do not have any of the missile fragments from Shanksville so therefor technically I am not in possession of physical evidence.

However, I have spoken with people who possess information and hold positions which would allow them access to that information and they have told me off the record that the official story in Shanksville is slightly different than what the American public has been told. As stated in my previous post these individuals are not willing to risk their lives, their families, & their careers speaking publicly at this time because they know the mainstream media is not going to give them airtime and that they will be subjected to harassment and ridicule from Bush supporting little neonazicons all over the internet. They choose not to throw their lives away only to be attacked relentlessly by nationalists such as yourself.

I have multiple eyewitnesses who place a highly classified UAV at the scene at the moment of impact at treetop level and for several minutes afterwards.

Wally Miller never presented any of the photographic evidence that he as coroner took of human remains at Indian Lake 2 miles away from the site. His conversation with Jeff Hill about these photographs can be heard at www.pumpitout.com. If you can explain why the coroner would be taking pictures of plane debris 2 miles away from the crash site for the FBI I would be really interested in hearing it.

So yes, I need subpoena powers to bring certain individuals to a courtroom to testify under oath and with immunity. You might think this is some big fucking game but rest assured it is the furthest thing from. You can sit behind your keyboard and post your mocking comments but the fact of the matter is you don't do anything other than place your faith in your government and the media to tell you the truth. Two entities that throughout history all over the world have been caught lying more times than be counted. You value their word over the word of honest everyday Americans because you don't like what average citizens have to say.
Top
« Next Oldest | CIT response | Next Newest »
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Sign-up for Free

Topic OptionsPages: (2) 1 [2] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1097 seconds | Archive