New pseudo-documentary 'The CIT Deception'

Good call!

Looks like the only "broken stick" is the one in the cockpit of the plane simulator making the impossible S-turn...

Haha no kidding.

Let's see if he is man enough to post the rebuttal in full (with links intact) at truthaction.

Doubt it.

Aside from your misogyny, i notice YOU haven't posted your rebuttal on truthaction.

Aside from your misogyny, i notice YOU haven't posted your rebuttal on truthaction.

Pardon me. It's is true that your cowardly anonymous nature means you could just as easily be female so I suppose I should have said "courage".




Believe me I'd love to if I could. They have arbitrarily banned me there out of pure censorship because my civil plea for reason converted some of their most intellectual contributors. Primarily Stefan and ChekNI who I believe are both known activists in the UK.

I see that you did NOT have the courage to post the full rebuttal (with links) and made sure to only casually post a link hoping it will be buried in the continuous ad hominem attacks against us.

Figures.

For those interested, the discussion with "broken sticks" who has now claimed his real name is "David Owen" continued for a bit here.

Until he puts out a tech paper as a full response to the thorough technical debunk by Pilots for 9/11 Truth it is clear that he has already lost the debate.

It's extremely doubtful he'll even attempt this as it's clear that David Owen has no expert qualifications or even remedial knowledge of aeronautics based on his response in the above thread.

I asked him:

He responded with this:

Rob replied:

Well, he does admit right on his YouTube channel that "Confusion" is one of his "Hobbies".

Having just read the thread on TruthAction, I like the support they give him because he is attacking CIT while not quite saying his whole video is a pile of crap. Sort of like "any enemy of my enemy is my friend".

That certainly seems to be their strategy. It's things like this which make me think that truth movement is infested with cointelpro agents. There is no chance ordinary people would react like this. It's so bizarre behavior that there has to be other reason ... It's incredible that they do not get ousted for this kind of blatant attempts to suppress evidence.

i see in that sorry thread broken sticks asked if you've ever flown a plane.......

HAS HE?

Why not debate him, if only for the comedy value?

Because his entire goal is to make a name for himself by attacking us no matter how ridiculous and unfounded his arguments are.

He has already exposed his complete ignorance regarding aeronautics and the entire premise of his argument has been ripped to shreds by real pilots.

His 15 minutes of fame are already up.

I have a couple of questions for broken sticks. I haven't had time to watch your video yet (limited internet access right now) but from what I've gathered there are definitely a couple of points I need clearing up:

1) Why is it the government faked the flight data, in your theory?

2) Is the absence of Paik and Morin in your theory due to the fact they don't fit your preferred conclusion, or some other reason?

Great questions, Stefan.

Things that make you go duuuuhhh.