| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (3) [1] 2 3 ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 22 2008, 02:46 PM
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Apparently a little birdie told John Farmer who the flyover witness is and Farmer leaked the name to Larson to publish.
It is Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts. The reason the government loyalists aren't making a big deal about the fact that his name has been released by someone other than us is because Roberts also has an audio interview from 11/30/2001 at the Library of Congress where he claims the same thing that he told us. Find Roosevelt Robert's name under this index: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/91...ecordingI1.html Or download direct: Real Audio MP3 WAV So there can be no doubt that the plane he saw was AFTER the explosion since he was in his booth hanging up the phone DURING the explosion. We simply got a hold of him to confirm all of these details that he already explained on the record a mere 45 days after the event. We mostly wanted to confirm how soon it was that he saw this "second" plane because that detail was not clarified in his first interview. We now know that he was immediately outside after the explosion proving he saw the flyover. We will be releasing an article and/or video presentation regarding this and the new swath of confirmed north side witnesses further proving the flyover and ultimately forcing the pseudoskeptics to look absolutely ridiculous in their blind efforts to deny this evidence that is confirmed and corroborated so heavily that it's becoming redundant. |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 22 2008, 04:54 PM
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Here is the clip that I played on Air America.
http://www.thepentacon.com/Roberts.mp3 The full interview will be released with the new north side witnesses. We have a couple more that we should have locked down soon then I'll put them all together. |
| riv |
Posted: May 23 2008, 03:10 PM
|
|
Investigangsta Group: "Team" Member Posts: 60 Member No.: 6 Joined: 2-December 07 |
omg.
I hope to read the full interview very soon, with complete informations about his pov and the path of the plane he witnessed. |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 23 2008, 03:16 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Go check out the instantaneous reaction to this from Farmer. It's so predictable. His timing is impeccable. Everything he does is in direct response to our research. He now ADMITS that there was a north side flyover yet asserts that AA77 still hit the building as the same time. LOL! Just as we always thought.......they want you to swallow a 3rd plane cover story!!! Too much. They are desperate riv. The spin is in full force. We have only just begun. Wait until you see what else we have. |
||
| seatnineb |
Posted: May 23 2008, 04:15 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 38 Member No.: 60 Joined: 20-March 08 |
Great work Craig.... Here is something I found years ago.........lost it ...and then refound it...
I live in the UK.....and this witness is from the UK...... You could track her down...if she is still living in the US... If she is back in the UK...I could give it a shot... |
||
| riv |
Posted: May 23 2008, 04:49 PM
|
|
Investigangsta Group: "Team" Member Posts: 60 Member No.: 6 Joined: 2-December 07 |
Yep I checked the latest Farmer's article and I had some exchanges on the matter with him. The timing of the #428 is a strange coincidence but frankly I'm not jumping to any conclusions.
|
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 23 2008, 05:44 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Ok and for the record here is our official response: Farmer admits north side flyover!!!!!! The 3rd plane cover story |
||
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 23 2008, 06:19 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
The link doesn't work bro. But that is a VERY important quote. Anything you can find out would be awesome. |
||
| Stinkey Puh |
Posted: May 23 2008, 07:30 PM
|
||
|
Advanced Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 43 Member No.: 46 Joined: 28-February 08 |
Ah, but is any of his flyover testimony corroborated? And he said it looked "silver" to him, while several other witnesses CIT has presented say it was white (Cindy Reyes?). Something to consider maybe: can a plane be white, with a brown/tan underbelly, and AA colors all at the same time? Very interesting. . . . . . |
||
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 23 2008, 08:58 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Very good point. My answer is yes. Why not? Color is certainly the most subjective detail nonetheless. No? General placement of the plane is clearly the most significant detail particularly when we are are talking about immediately after the explosion! |
||
| Bitterman |
Posted: May 23 2008, 10:15 PM
|
|
Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 29 Member No.: 9 Joined: 11-December 07 |
That fact, the color. is the most UN-important fact. Like it means something. The world could be COLORLESS and the fact that a plane flies over the building remains.
Anyone who fucking quotes that as a legit reason for the plane not being in the place they say it was is a fucking unt. oops, my "C" key is broken. Those "people" who argue those kinds of points are fucking traitors to humanity. I don't feel threatened at all by dudes who live in mud huts in the mid east. Then again, I don't go around bombing other peoples' countries and saying it in the name of "democracy". I feel more threatened by those who live South of the boarder. |
| seatnineb |
Posted: May 24 2008, 10:07 AM
|
||||||||
|
Advanced Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 38 Member No.: 60 Joined: 20-March 08 |
Craig....this might be our "jet headed towards congress AFTER pentagon explosion" witness
Can't find an email address though... |
||||||||
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 25 2008, 04:37 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Haha. For the record everyone...Bitterman is Canadian so he isn't talking about Mexicans! |
||
| seatnineb |
Posted: May 26 2008, 07:44 AM
|
||
|
Advanced Member Group: "Team" Member Posts: 38 Member No.: 60 Joined: 20-March 08 |
Note: This witness's team leader saw the 757 over the mall. The witness himself saw the e-4. |
||
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 26 2008, 10:10 AM
|
||||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,914 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Wow another great find seatnineb! You're the king at finding those obscure forum posts! I think the fact that the poster says this is EXTREMELY important:
This is further evidence that the word around town is that it flew over DC. I guarantee you that is what most people STILL think is the official story and have absolutely no clue about the contradictory data released by the NTSB in 2006. |
||||
Pages: (3) [1] 2 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |