|· Portal||Help Search Members Calendar|
|Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )||Resend Validation Email|
|Craig Ranke CIT||
Posted: Dec 6 2007, 03:25 PM
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07
Caustic Logic took this deceptive quote from Arabesque's personal attack blog against us and ran with it:
The problem is that we never called Lloyd or anyone specific "the devil".
Dylan was wrong just like they are.
Aldo has said more than once that we have "looked the devil in the eye" during our investigations. This is merely a metaphor (and a well known one) that was first used during our radio interview with Jeff Rense.
But NEVER have we specifically called Lloyd or anyone "the devil".
Yet the words have been twisted and the CIT haters use them regularly to try and make us look bad since they can not refute the evidence we present.
The fact is that while Aldo certainly was referring to the fact that we have spoken direct with operatives who are directly and willingly complicit in mass murder.....he was NOT referring to anyone specific and he was not literally calling anyone "the devil".
It is simply a metaphor.
Although CL agreed to "retract" this claim during part 2 of our debate......he did something entirely different.
He used his imagination to write a literary interpretation of what we meant and STILL insisted on including nonsense about Lloyd's eyes. Here it is:
Have you ever heard anyone lay the bullshit on so thick?
We never said ANY of that.
Lloyd's account is dismissed as invalid because it has been proven to be invalid by the CITGO witnesses but also because it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
The evidence is there proving this.
Caustic Logic is deceptively twisting our words AND meaning in order to make us out to seem like we are basing the information on a wild emotional hunch without regard to evidence.
As if we are looking at the evidence from a "theological" stand-point.
It's completely incorrect, a VERY manipulative, and deliberate attempt to frame us on his part.