Home          Evidence       Strategy       FAQ       Report       News       Contact





Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  ( Go to first unread post )

 Flyover witness revealed, before we planned to but oh well.
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 22 2008, 02:46 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



Apparently a little birdie told John Farmer who the flyover witness is and Farmer leaked the name to Larson to publish.

It is Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts.

The reason the government loyalists aren't making a big deal about the fact that his name has been released by someone other than us is because Roberts also has an audio interview from 11/30/2001 at the Library of Congress where he claims the same thing that he told us.

Find Roosevelt Robert's name under this index:
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/collections/91...ecordingI1.html

Or download direct:
Real Audio
MP3
WAV

So there can be no doubt that the plane he saw was AFTER the explosion since he was in his booth hanging up the phone DURING the explosion.

We simply got a hold of him to confirm all of these details that he already explained on the record a mere 45 days after the event.

We mostly wanted to confirm how soon it was that he saw this "second" plane because that detail was not clarified in his first interview.

We now know that he was immediately outside after the explosion proving he saw the flyover.

We will be releasing an article and/or video presentation regarding this and the new swath of confirmed north side witnesses further proving the flyover and ultimately forcing the pseudoskeptics to look absolutely ridiculous in their blind efforts to deny this evidence that is confirmed and corroborated so heavily that it's becoming redundant.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 22 2008, 04:54 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



Here is the clip that I played on Air America.

http://www.thepentacon.com/Roberts.mp3

The full interview will be released with the new north side witnesses.

We have a couple more that we should have locked down soon then I'll put them all together.
Top
riv
Posted: May 23 2008, 03:10 PM


Investigangsta


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 60
Member No.: 6
Joined: 2-December 07



omg.

I hope to read the full interview very soon, with complete informations about his pov and the path of the plane he witnessed.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 23 2008, 03:16 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



QUOTE (riv @ May 23 2008, 11:10 PM)
omg.

I hope to read the full interview very soon, with complete informations about his pov and the path of the plane he witnessed.

Go check out the instantaneous reaction to this from Farmer.

It's so predictable.

His timing is impeccable. Everything he does is in direct response to our research.

He now ADMITS that there was a north side flyover yet asserts that AA77 still hit the building as the same time.
LOL!

Just as we always thought.......they want you to swallow a 3rd plane cover story!!!

Too much.

They are desperate riv.

The spin is in full force.

We have only just begun.

Wait until you see what else we have.
Top
seatnineb
Posted: May 23 2008, 04:15 PM


Advanced Member


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 38
Member No.: 60
Joined: 20-March 08



Great work Craig....

Here is something I found years ago.........lost it ...and then refound it...

QUOTE

We first heard there was a fire at the Pentagon and then there was a really low flying aircraft outside our window that nearly knocked out all the glass. It seemed to be heading straight for congress.
Harriet Anderson, Sheffield, England, but working in Washington D
http://www24.brinkster.com/kazim420/11c/usa/eyewitness.... .


I live in the UK.....and this witness is from the UK......

You could track her down...if she is still living in the US...

If she is back in the UK...I could give it a shot...
Top
riv
Posted: May 23 2008, 04:49 PM


Investigangsta


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 60
Member No.: 6
Joined: 2-December 07



Yep I checked the latest Farmer's article and I had some exchanges on the matter with him. The timing of the #428 is a strange coincidence but frankly I'm not jumping to any conclusions.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 23 2008, 05:44 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



QUOTE (riv @ May 24 2008, 12:49 AM)
Yep I checked the latest Farmer's article and I had some exchanges on the matter with him. The timing of the #428 is a strange coincidence but frankly I'm not jumping to any conclusions.

Ok and for the record here is our official response:

Farmer admits north side flyover!!!!!! The 3rd plane cover story
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 23 2008, 06:19 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



QUOTE (seatnineb @ May 24 2008, 12:15 AM)


If she is back in the UK...I could give it a shot...

The link doesn't work bro.

But that is a VERY important quote.

Anything you can find out would be awesome.
Top
Stinkey Puh
Posted: May 23 2008, 07:30 PM


Advanced Member


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 43
Member No.: 46
Joined: 28-February 08



QUOTE ("Craig")
We now know that he was immediately outside after the explosion proving he saw the flyover.

Ah, but is any of his flyover testimony corroborated? And he said it looked "silver" to him, while several other witnesses CIT has presented say it was white (Cindy Reyes?).

Something to consider maybe: can a plane be white, with a brown/tan underbelly, and AA colors all at the same time?

Very interesting. . . . . . wink.gif
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 23 2008, 08:58 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



QUOTE (Stinkey Puh @ May 24 2008, 03:30 AM)


Something to consider maybe: can a plane be white, with a brown/tan underbelly, and AA colors all at the same time?

Very interesting. . . . . . wink.gif

Very good point.

My answer is yes.

Why not?

Color is certainly the most subjective detail nonetheless. No?

General placement of the plane is clearly the most significant detail particularly when we are are talking about immediately after the explosion!

Top
Bitterman
Posted: May 23 2008, 10:15 PM


Member


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 29
Member No.: 9
Joined: 11-December 07



That fact, the color. is the most UN-important fact. Like it means something. The world could be COLORLESS and the fact that a plane flies over the building remains.

Anyone who fucking quotes that as a legit reason for the plane not being in the place they say it was is a fucking unt.

oops, my "C" key is broken.

Those "people" who argue those kinds of points are fucking traitors to humanity.

I don't feel threatened at all by dudes who live in mud huts in the mid east. Then again, I don't go around bombing other peoples' countries and saying it in the name of "democracy".

I feel more threatened by those who live South of the boarder.
Top
seatnineb
Posted: May 24 2008, 10:07 AM


Advanced Member


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 38
Member No.: 60
Joined: 20-March 08



QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ May 23 2008, 06:19 PM)
QUOTE (seatnineb @ May 24 2008, 12:15 AM)


If she is back in the UK...I could give it a shot...

The link doesn't work bro.

But that is a VERY important quote.

Anything you can find out would be awesome.


Craig....this might be our "jet headed towards congress AFTER pentagon explosion" witness

QUOTE

I am Harriet Anderson, a party political activist in northern England and Postgraduate student at the Sheffield University school of Journalism. I have been active in politics since I was 14, and have worked in Westminster, in Washington and most recently for the Labour party.
http://activewiththeactivists.wordpress.co...out/#comment-38


QUOTE

We first heard there was a fire at the Pentagon and then there was a really low flying aircraft outside our window that nearly knocked out all the glass. It seemed to be heading straight for congress.
Harriet Anderson, Sheffield, England, but working in Washington D
http://www24.brinkster.com/kazim420/11c/usa/eyewitness.... .


Can't find an email address though...
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 25 2008, 04:37 PM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



QUOTE (Bitterman @ May 24 2008, 06:15 AM)


I feel more threatened by those who live South of the boarder.

Haha.

For the record everyone...Bitterman is Canadian so he isn't talking about Mexicans!

Top
seatnineb
Posted: May 26 2008, 07:44 AM


Advanced Member


Group: "Team" Member
Posts: 38
Member No.: 60
Joined: 20-March 08





QUOTE

My Team Leader came in to say as he was coming in to the building, he saw a 757 flying in a peculiar location roughly OVER THE MALL.
http://forums.techguy.org/archive/index.php/t-72752.htm


Note:

This witness's team leader saw the 757 over the mall.

The witness himself saw the e-4.
Top
Craig Ranke CIT
Posted: May 26 2008, 10:10 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,949
Member No.: 1
Joined: 29-August 07



QUOTE (seatnineb @ May 26 2008, 03:44 PM)

This witness's team leader saw the 757 over the mall.

The witness himself saw the e-4.

Wow another great find seatnineb!

You're the king at finding those obscure forum posts!

I think the fact that the poster says this is EXTREMELY important:

QUOTE

(We now know that was the 757 that hit the Pentagon as it did circle downtown DC, supposedly looking for a target, possibly the Whitehouse which is not as easy to pick out from the air as the Capitol or the Pentagon, before heading west again, then turning east for its final run at the Pentagon.)


This is further evidence that the word around town is that it flew over DC.

I guarantee you that is what most people STILL think is the official story and have absolutely no clue about the contradictory data released by the NTSB in 2006.
Top
« Next Oldest | The North Side Flyover - Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed | Next Newest »

Topic OptionsPages: (3) [1] 2 3 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1510 seconds | Archive