The light poles were staged in advance., and not downed by a plane or vortex.

Ummm.....the entire creating of CIT is based on this evidence and it has now been confirmed 10 times over and not refuted by anyone.

catgrlz is right. If you are really this clueless about what we present why bother posting at all?

Remember these guys?



That is confirmed, validated, corroborated PROOF the plane did not hit the poles and we have a lot more validation of this claim coming soon.

Really?

You have 10 people who say they saw a C-130 clip light poles?



Clearly you do not even have ONE person who says this.

Seriously sweetpea....cut it with the idiotic arguments.

You are cluttering up our research forum with garbage so you are now restricted to the debate forum.

Feel free to post any issues you have with our research there.

Following copied from this thread.


It seems that one of the most difficult things for people to understand is how they could have planted the 5 downed light poles without being noticed.

A better question to ask would be why would anyone notice a planted light pole on the road to begin with?

The answer is simple.....you wouldn't.

The light poles could have all been laid out in advance off to the side the night before and there isn't a reason in the world that anyone would have noticed them.

Here is direct evidence of the lack of attention a downed light pole on the highway near the Pentagon would get.

In "Eye of the Storm" we reference images of a downed light pole from the area as photographed by undercover CIT member 22205, our Arlington asset.




The images were used in the presentation to contrast the difference between the breakage in the bases and demonstrate how pole 4 from 9/11 has suspiciously uniform damage in comparison:


What's amazing is that he took the images 2 years ago in December 2006 yet the pole STILL remains on the side of the road and was even photographed by the google maps "street view" cam!







Google only recently published the "street view" in Arlington and it's an amazing resource.

This pole is right up the highway 1/3rd of a mile from Lloyde's location on 9/11 and less than a 1/4 mile from VDOT who is in charge of light pole maintenance and salvage.

The 9/11 poles planted in advance only needed to go unnoticed for a single night and as I said they could have easily been hidden off to the side on the shoulder like this before the event and pulled out to their final places shortly after the violent event during all the initial chaos while the Pentagon burned.

Easy schmeezy.

(just added some new pics to the google streetview thread,
thought i would include them here in this thread as well)


new pics of old pole (taken today 1/4/09):









this pole has been down for over 2 years and counting...

People who cannot understand, that "frame ups"...and "staging" is literally typical intelligence work...than I don't know what to tell them...

It is all about deception, staging a scene to make it "Look" a certain way to support their claim is utterly simple, and not even very surprising...

Sweetpea, saying "where's the evidence for this" is not an argument "against" the evidence...it just means you haven't even looked at it.

The light poles have always struck me as having a huge possibility of being a smoking gun.

After rereading this thread, it dawned on me that if even a single photo(google earth, satellite, etc)could be produced that depicted these poles anytime prior to say 9:30 that morning(or earlier)9/11 would be blown wide open, if they were already NOT THERE, by that time. IE, they had already been layed down before the plane flew through the area.


Just thinkin

I guarantee you that they have been swept clean from any database, archive, or website.

The dispute between Chandler/Legge and the Pilots about the exact profile of the flight path in the last, lately added FDR seconds (which Boeing refuses to decode) brought me to the question, whether anyone has already reconstructed the hight of the flightpath according to the kinks and the lengths of the undamaged parts of the downed light poles?

The guys who faked the crash made so many mistakes that I would be surprized if they did cut the light poles in a sufficiently consistent manner; for example the undamaged part of light pole 4 seems to be too long.

Someone would have to go to the Pentagon with a laser pointer and/or a good telephoto camera, fixed at a long rod, to find out the exact altitudes of the damage points, and the corresponding flight altitude, with a measurement error of not more than a few inches. I guess someone studying land measurement could do this with an error of less than 1 inch.

It's just an idea..