| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Craig Ranke CIT |
Posted: May 15 2009, 10:34 PM
|
||
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 1,927 Member No.: 1 Joined: 29-August 07 |
Yes but he only claims to have witnessed the aftermath of both events and NOT to have seen either crash. The media likes to imply that he actually witnessed both or at least one of the alleged crashes when the evidence proves he witnessed neither. |
||
| Voskhod3 |
Posted: Aug 15 2009, 04:42 AM
|
||
|
Investigangsta Group: Friends Posts: 120 Member No.: 1,047 Joined: 17-July 09 |
The C-130 was supposedly pointing directly at the Pentagon at 09.37.45 according to RADES. |
||
| A.Marquis |
Posted: Sep 3 2009, 02:28 PM
|
||||
|
Investigangsta Group: Admin Posts: 680 Member No.: 2 Joined: 31-August 07 |
That doesn't mean anything. 1. Because the RADES data has already been proven to be fraudelant 2. Because he can still be pointed at the pentagon and not know what or where was hit nor could he see the flyaway, if he could not tell what or where was hit. |
||||
Pages: (3) 1 2 [3] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |