I assume most people have seen this video, but just in case you missed it, view it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&feature=related

This is very interesting stuff!

This is the kind of stuff that bothers me..........

I debunked this disinformation that the 1994 scar is the wings the day this guy put this video up on the web. The very same day. He intentionally rotated the map to deceive and mislead people into thinking this is an image of the 2001 "wingprint". The scar he is claiming are the wingprints are too far north.

While it is possible the wingprint was made similarly I have not seen any evidence that it was, let alone "smoking gun proof".

Alex Jones ran this on Prison Planet.

This video has 113,000+ views.

Yet my interview with Susan McElwain which contains no disinformation and no deception and isn't in any way misleading has been viewed just over 7,000 times (750+ times 40 minute uncut - 6,300+ 10 min Youtube).

Alex Jones didn't run the Susan McElwain video on Prison Planet. Even though the 10 minute version is a direct rebuttal to the History Channel Hitpiece and I put it together intentionally to attack Hearst.

Put this in the "things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmm" category.

Can you link to your video?

Thanks!

In the interview pinned at the top of this forum there is the 10 minute version and the complete 40 minute version.

Please watch. Thanks!

Yeah, you'd think Alex Jones would be running this stuff. What do you think about the fact that he isn't?

All I have to say is that I was just completely accosted by the mods on the prisonplanet forum.

I barely post there at all and I posted a thread with a trailer for the new presentation.

One of the mods (who goes by Sane) made a sticky out of it and it was even hosted on prisonplanet.com but then the mod jimd3100 went ballistic.

He went OFF on me, moved my thread to a trash forum, and CONTINUED to attack me non-stop mostly by digging up dirt between us and Dylan.

But he also changed the title of my thread to be "The ultimate con on the 911 truth movement: Pentacon".

Can you believe that?!! He changed the title of MY thread so those words are now attributed to ME!

Soon Sane started attacking me too so it was nothing but me against the two moderators!

Obviously the regular members were too afraid to even touch it.

This was all just the other day when I first released the new movie.

It ain't pretty but if you want to read it here you go:
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=27201.0

Amazing! jimd3100 is pushing the gov's official storyline on a prisonplanet forum??!! I wonder what Alex Jones would say about that? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate alot of the work that Jones has done, but sometimes he's hyperbolic and off base and I feel that he plays on people's fears too much...maybe I'm misinterpreting or misunderstanding though.
But damn, he has a shill moderating a forum. What do you think is up with that?

Well AJ has refused to have us on his show too so whatever.

There is clearly a group of people who have a strong interest in keeping the Pentagon OUT of the 9/11 debate.

I don't understand. Instead of shying away from the Pentagon problem, I would think that anyone really interested in truth would be trying to dissect what happened there, because it is so important.

i think im going to start some shit over there......

eta : i can't. that place is just so awful. it sucks so bad and the gatekeepers are running it.

Look out!

Yeah they got that place on lock but good luck!

I don't know what to think. It's disappointing.


He really has no credibility with me after seeing his actions with us and PFT.

Personally, I'm perplexed by AJ. When I first found out about him I was excited that finally someone was telling some truth. But when you really listen to him, some of his claims don't add up. For example, he denies the power of Israel and Zionism. He sometimes comes from a hardline Christian angle, that causes him to loose some credibility with me right off the bat. Also, it really bothers me that he demonizes Mexican immigrants so much when in reality they are victims of globalism just like the rest of us....and the list goes on. So I'll totally be digging what he's saying, then he'll float a snickers in the punchbowl that'll really upset me. It is disappointing.

Yeah, I have the same thoughts on Alex Jones. "Hyperbolic?" (for sure!). And yes, he won't touch the Zio-Trotskyites with a ten-foot pole. Pretty hard to pull off if you're really looking for sources of problems! Anyway, he does have, mmmm, "gonads". What I see is that blogs and websites tend to want to be "heroes" or "personalities" rather than information-sharing assets. I don't know if anyone has the absolute "solution" to how this was done. I do know bunk when I see it though. The real issue is that . [U]it was an inside job[/U] Absolutely no doubt about it.
Now, if I were one of those scumballs who specialize in keeping "the Rabble" from getting at the truth, I might use all of this "human nature" against those who's egos are too big for their wisdom. So look what we end up with. We have "theories" of "how" this happened with people hurling insults and invective rather than digging up facts. Newsflash! They aren't offering a prize for the "right" theory. Hell, my guess is that the level of voracity of a given theory is directly proportional to the level of surrvellance one is experiencing!
People need to focus on what's out there to learn. I suspect there's a LOT of useful stuff that could shed even more light on the operation. The more the merrier.
People worry incessantly about their "credibility". To me that means that they have to have "approval" to feel "right" about their conclusions. I say, get it out there. If you have some evidence, or a "thought", let's hear it. People can analyze that the maybe all or some of it may add to the collective knowledge of the subject. I've run across pearls buried in dross before.

Yeah, I have definitely noticed this too but I don't understand why. It seems to me to be by far the strongest and easiest to understand of all the evidence contradicting the government's story.

I gotta say, Craig, I really appreciate your no-nonsense debate style, both in real-time debates and in forums. You basically destroyed Caustic Logic and the Frustrating Fraud (can't remember which one you destroyed and which one Aldo destroyed.) You don't mince words, and call people on information that is wrong or unclear, including myself. Some people don't like that, and perhaps they confuse your correction of information with a personal attack.

I don't know, I don't get it at all. It is clear though, that there is a bias against the Pentagon evidence in favor of WTC 1, 2 and 7, which makes no sense to me because that evidence is less persuasive than the NOC evidence.