Ok so Farmer is releasing the last of the CMH interviews on jref as they stumble all over each other like clowns in a VW bug without realizing that we have already interviewed most of the ANC accounts and confirmed that they 100% corroborate the north side approach.

But I downloaded neit426 today and whoa nelly there is a quote that in there that is HUGE!

The guy works at ANC but was inside the building when the explosion happened. He gives a pretty good account of he C-130 BUT he also relays how people were confused about what had just happened and some were saying that the plane kept on going!!!!

I kid you not.

Download mp3 here:
http://www.thepentacon.com/neit426.mp3

The evidence is closing in on them.

We know that people saw the flyover.

This officially documented interview from 2001 reveals what people REALLY first reported before the propaganda set in.

Really good find.

That's a pretty amazing interview. It sounded like both men agree that it seemed like a flyover.

Frankly this is major.

It's the most blatant and direct reference to a flyover yet because Roosevelt Roberts thought it was a "2nd plane" and couldn't see the approach.

There is no way this would be confused with a flyover by ANYONE if the official low an level 1st floor impact was true.

nice find.

Any chance of determining the interviewee?

No man all that has been redacted.


ETA: I knew there was more than a "chance" when I posted this but I was trying not to let our detractors know that I had a phone number already. The interview link is provided later in the thread.

Oh come on now, it's just "war stories", "he said, she said". Remember?

Why would a 2001 interview of an ANC worker saying he heard eyewitnesses saying that the pentagon was bombed and a plane did not hit and just kept going be important to an investigation where the evidence uncovered indicates the Pentagpn was bombed and the plane did not hit and just kept going???

They are scrambling like cockroaches.

That demented lying traitor Farmer actually posted stars and stripes reporter Lisa Burgess' audio account as if that somehow proves all of the north side witnesses wrong!

The problem is that she was inside the Pentagon at the time of the attack and only saw the fireball through a window as she was rushing to get out of there!
:lol:

Furthermore she claims the explosion threw her up against the wall!

Yet Farmer is literally claiming the fact that she didn't say she saw a plane fly over the Pentagon proves that none did.

Obviously this logic is inherently flawed since absence of evidence is not evidence.

Not surprising that the pseudo-skeptics shamelessly lap up such flawed logic in their utter disregard for critical thinking principles.

Burgess is NOT a witness.

Nobody knows exactly where the plane passed over the building and it may not have gone over the courtyard at all as it headed toward south parking.

Furthermore if she was thrown against the wall like she said the plane would have been long gone after she regained her composure. Plus her true POV through the window is unknown anyway.

Bottom line her non-witness account does NOTHING whatsoever to refute the overwhelming evidence for a north side approach from all the real witnesses who DID see the plane.

The level of desperation here is pathetic.

This new account can fairly be considered hard direct evidence that a flyover is what people in the critical area to witness the event immediately reported before the propaganda set in.

Is anyone working on a 3D view point from Maintenance Building 123 at Arlington?

Apparently they have a view of the "hole" but the black smoke is blocking the view.

I did a basic google map check but individual buildings are not named.

I also noticed his timing on the arrival of the diving of the C-130 is off as he states was a few seconds after they were talking. .

One other question, have you forwarded the link to other ANC employees to see if they recognize the voice of the interviewee?

What a great piece of evidence if the details can be fleshed out...

ANC employee whose brother in law works at the Pentagon. I wonder who that might be on the list.

I finally was able to discern the last part due to poor laptop audio speakers. Unbelievable!
"I thought it was a fly over....I'm missing another fly over, I love these things....and then the big BOOM BOOM" this would be yet another reason for people on the ground to not be surprised by a jet plane flying over the area as its a regular occurrence!


All I can say is, WOW! :o

Yeah Maria De la Cerda said she thought it was a harmless flyover at first too.

"Missing man formation".

They have fighter jets do that in honor of high ranking military men that pass.

It happens often at ANC.

Thanks to CMH for releasing these crucial interviews, these have been a gold mine.

The interview describes the event EXACTLY as CIT predicted-- The North Side Flyover.

Yes, another key witness.

Ok folks we got a hold of this witness today.

As you can hear in the CMH interview his name did not get properly redacted and he spells it out as Erik Dihle.

Unfortunately he does not remember anything about the flyover witnesses.

Naturally he dismissed this in his mind back in 2001 after the propaganda set in as it would seem like an anomalous insignificant detail to him.


BUT......

Just as I thought he 100% confirms the northwest approach of the C-130 as reported by all the other ANC witnesses proving the 84 RADES data fraudulent and fully supporting our claims about the pilot Lt Col Steve O'Brien describing the attack jet headed for DC skies.

This is HUGELY significant and 100% proves evidence tampering to facilitate the 2nd plane cover story and cover-up the east side approach of the attack jet.

Listen to interview here.

lol. The contrast between his extreme level of certainty and non-chalaunt tone and the earth-shattering implications of what he is saying made me laugh while I was listening to this.

Yeah and his reaction at the end when I tell him the radar data has it coming from the south was a bit much too.

Contrary to what some people think I don't enjoy doing this.

While there is a bit of satisfaction in obtaining further validation of what we already know the incredible implications of such a seemingly small piece of evidence weighs heavily on my psyche as does the fact that I know this will have a deep and likely permanent affect on the Erik's psyche as well.

But he can't change what he and all the other witnesses saw and neither can we.

OHHHHH I was so hoping you would remind him of his quote in the audio recording that he gave to the CMH about other folks who apparently saw a fly over.

Why in the world would a private citizen need to have you confront the Public Affairs Dept. for his own person experience? Filter anyone?

Great job though getting even more evidence proving the RADES tape is fake.

There is no point to fake the rades/and push a 2nd plane cover story if the attack jet did what it allegedly did. There is no need at all unless your covering for something else...NOC FO!

I did!

Oh I heard you 'ask' him about it and then he denied it likely due to failing memory or a scrub of the brain.

I was referring to playing the audio clip for him where he makes those comments to maybe refresh his memory.

He can't sit there and say "people thought the plane kept going" so soon after the event before the cover is put into place in an interview and then turn around and say "no one said that or saw a fly over at all" years later.

It would be interesting to see him hear his own voice make those comments to judge his reaction and then try to deny them.

Do you think you guys will contact the Public Relations Office to set up an interview under the guise of research for a less controversial line of inquiry? Sort of stave off the opposition to anything contradicting the OS?

As always we'll try to keep the dialog open but I don't think there is anything more to get from him regarding his account.

See TDesmon, other people saw it as well.

Bump for Scootle.